Fixation versus arthroplasty for faster recovery after minimally displaced femoral neck fractures (FASTER-HIP)
Official title: Musculoskeletal Adaptive Platform Trial (MAPT): Fixation Versus Arthroplasty Surgical Treatments for Early Recovery After HIP Fracture (FASTER-HIP)
Run by University of Southern California · NCT07244211 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether replacing the hip (arthroplasty) instead of fixing the bone (internal fixation) helps people aged 60 and older with minimally displaced femoral neck fractures recover faster, stay alive and walking, and spend more days at home over the first year.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 60 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 600 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Southern California Academic / other |
| Locations | 32 sites (Irvine, California and 31 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 23, 2026 |
| Main results expected | February 28, 2029 |
| Study ends | January 31, 2030 |
| Registry record updated | November 10, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07244211 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 60 or older with a low-energy, minimally displaced complete femoral neck fracture that the attending surgeon believes could be treated either with arthroplasty or in situ internal fixation and who are medically fit for surgery are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients whose fractures are not minimally displaced, who are not clinically suitable for either surgical option, who have expected survival under 12 months, or who cannot consent are unlikely to benefit from this comparison.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
FASTER-HIP is a pragmatic, randomized, open-label comparative effectiveness domain within the Musculoskeletal Adaptive Platform Trial that randomizes older adults with minimally displaced femoral neck fractures to arthroplasty or in situ internal fixation. Eligible patients are age 60 or older with low-energy, minimally displaced complete femoral neck fractures judged by the surgeon to be treatable with either option, and procedures are performed by experienced surgeons. Primary outcomes include death, preservation of ambulation, days alive and out of hospital, and patient-reported health status measured at 4 and 12 months. The platform design allows this domain to run alongside other interventions under shared infrastructure and prespecified stopping rules.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If arthroplasty is superior, patients could experience fewer deaths and reoperations, better walking ability, and more days alive and at home in the months after injury.
How similar studies have gone: Observational studies and limited randomized data have suggested arthroplasty may reduce reoperation and mortality and improve ambulation for some displaced or minimally displaced femoral neck fractures, but high-quality randomized evidence for this specific comparison remains limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * 60 years of age or older undergoing surgery due to a minimally displaced femoral neck fracture * The patient has a health condition affecting physical mobility. * Complete fracture of the femoral neck (AO/OTA 31B) confirmed with anteroposterior and lateral hip radiographs, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging. * Minimally displaced fracture that could be, in the judgment of the attending surgeon, managed with either arthroplasty or in situ internal fixation without reduction. * Low energy injury mechanism. * Surgeons with expertise in internal fixation and total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty are available to perform surgery. Exclusion Criteria: * The patient is not clinically suitable for either compared treatment. * Expected injury survival of less than 12 months. * Terminal illness with expected survival of less than 12 months. * Incarceration. * Unable to obtain informed consent due to language barriers. * Unable to obtain informed consent because the legally authorized representative was unavailable. * Problems, in the judgment of the study personnel, with maintaining follow-up with the patient. * Currently enrolled in a study or intervention domain that does not permit co-enrollment. * Prior enrollment in the specific platform trial intervention domain. * Patient or legally authorized representative did not provide informed consent (declined participation). * Eligible patient or legally authorized representative was not approached within the screening window (missed participant). * Other reasons to exclude the patient, as approved by the data coordinating center. * Associated lower extremity injury that prevents post-operative weight-bearing. * Retained hardware around the hip that precludes either study treatment. * Infection around the hip (soft tissue or bone). * Pathologic fracture with a lytic lesion in the femoral neck that precludes internal fixation. * Injury did not occur within 21 days of screening. * Patient is too ill, in the judgment of the attending surgeon, for internal fixation. * Patient is too ill, in the judgment of the attending surgeon, for arthroplasty.
Where it's running
-
University of California, Irvine
Irvine, California, United States Recruiting -
Los Angeles General Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States Recruiting -
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, United States Recruiting -
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States Recruiting -
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States Recruiting -
Indiana University
Bloomington, Indiana, United States Recruiting
Show 26 more locations
-
University of Maryland, Baltimore - R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States Recruiting -
University of Maryland Capital Region Health
Largo, Maryland, United States Recruiting -
Massachusetts General Brigham
Boston, Massachusetts, United States Recruiting -
University of Mississippi
University, Mississippi, United States Recruiting -
NYU Langone Health
New York, New York, United States Recruiting -
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States Recruiting -
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States Recruiting -
St. Luke's University Health System
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States Recruiting -
Prisma Health-Upstate
Greenville, South Carolina, United States Recruiting -
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, United States Recruiting -
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States Recruiting -
Inova Health Care Services
Fairfax, Virginia, United States Recruiting -
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, United States Recruiting -
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Recruiting -
Fraser Health Authority
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Recruiting -
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada Recruiting -
Sykehuset Østfold HF / Østfold Hospital Trust
Grålum, Norway Recruiting -
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, United States Not yet recruiting -
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States Not yet recruiting -
University of Vermont
Burlington, Vermont, United States Not yet recruiting -
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Canada Not yet recruiting -
Hospital Universitario Mutua de Terrassa
Barcelona, Spain Not yet recruiting -
Consorci Sanitari de l'Alt Penedès i Garraf (CSAPG)
Barcelona, Spain Not yet recruiting -
FRCB-IDIBAPS (Hospital Clinic Barcelona)
Barcelona, Spain Not yet recruiting -
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, Spain Not yet recruiting -
University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, United Kingdom Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Joseph T Patterson, MD — University of Southern California
- Study coordinator: Joseph Patterson, MD
- Email: OrthoTraumaResearch@med.usc.edu
- Phone: +13234426984
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Collarless Actis hip stem for cementless hip replacement in Asian patients
This study tests how well a collarless Actis hip stem works in adults undergoing primary hip replacement, focusing on outcomes over five years in an East Asian population.
-
Bone marrow injection at the femoral neck fracture site in young adults with intracapsular hip fractures
This study tests whether injecting the patient’s own bone marrow into a femoral neck fracture helps it heal faster and reduces avascular necrosis in adults aged 18–55 with certain fracture types.
-
Tipmed™ Primary Hip Prosthesis: 24-Month Post-Market Follow-Up in Adults
This PMCF study tests the safety and 24‑month performance of the Tipmed hip prosthesis in adults undergoing primary hip replacement.
-
Sacral ESPB versus PENG nerve block for pain after hip hemiarthroplasty
We will see if a sacral erector spinae plane (S-ESPB) block or a pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block gives better pain relief for adults 50–90 having hip hemiarthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture.
-
How ciprofol behaves and affects older adults having limb surgery under general anesthesia
This study tests whether ciprofol provides safe and effective anesthesia for older adults having elective limb surgery by measuring drug levels and clinical responses.
-
AI-assisted vs surgeon-planned screw paths for freehand femoral neck fixation
This trial will test whether AI-assisted planning leads to more accurate screw placement, shorter operative time, and less radiation for adults having cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.