Evaluating the effectiveness of guidewire in intravenous catheter placement
Official title: Evaluating the Role of the Guidewire in Peripheral Intravenous Access: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Catheter Survival
Run by Corewell Health East · NCT06107361 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether an intravenous catheter with a built-in guide wire works better than one without it for people needing IV treatment.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 360 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Corewell Health East Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Royal Oak, Michigan) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 7, 2023 |
| Main results expected | June 30, 2026 |
| Study ends | July 31, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | June 10, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06107361 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adults aged 18 and older with a vascular access score of 4 or 5.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients under 18 years old or those with restricted mobility of the elbow joint or cognitive impairments may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial is a randomized controlled trial that aims to compare the effectiveness of two types of ultralong intravenous catheters: one with a built-in guide wire and one without. A total of 360 participants will be enrolled and randomly assigned to either the control group or the experimental group. The study will assess catheter failure rates and other insertion-related data, including clinician experience and patient characteristics. Participants will be monitored until the catheter is removed to gather comprehensive data on the performance of each catheter type.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved intravenous catheter placement techniques, reducing complications such as phlebitis and infections.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have explored similar catheter techniques, but the specific use of a guide wire in this context is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Study Participants Inclusion Criteria: ≥ than 18 years old Vascular Access Score of 4 or 5 Vascular Access Score: 1. Visible with distention and easily palpable 2. Visible and easily palpable 3. Not visible and easily palpable 4. Visible and poorly palpable 5. Not visible and poorly or non-palpable Study participants exclusion criteria: \<18 years old Restricted mobility of elbow joint Cognitively impaired. Skin complications that limit access to the potential IV site Clinician Participants Inclusion Criteria: Clinician working in the emergency department at Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital (physician, advanced practice provider, nurse, technician) Competency in Operation STICK, which is an vascular access training program. Clinician participants exclusion criteria: None
Where it's running
-
Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Amit Bahl, MD — Corewell Health East
- Study coordinator: Amit Bahl, MD
- Email: amit.bahl@corewellhealth.org
- Phone: 248-898-9111
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
How anesthesia type affects thinking after bariatric sleeve surgery
This observational study tests whether intravenous anesthesia or inhalational anesthesia leads to different cognitive outcomes after sleeve gastrectomy in adults with obesity.
-
Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion Models (Schnider vs Eleveld) During Spinal Surgery
This observational study tests whether two propofol target-controlled infusion models, Schnider and Eleveld, lead to different anesthetic depth and hemodynamic responses during the first 10 minutes of anesthesia induction in adults undergoing spinal surgery.
-
Relationship Between Burst Suppression at Start of Anesthesia and Deepness of TIVA
This study checks if early burst suppression in brain activity during anesthesia predicts deeper anesthesia later in the operation for adults having total intravenous anesthesia.
-
Monitoring anesthetic depth during brain tumor surgery
This study is testing two ways to give anesthesia during brain tumor surgery to see which method helps patients stay at the right level of sedation and recover better afterward.
-
Dexmedetomidine infusion to reduce intraoperative remifentanil use during laparoscopic abdominal surgery
This trial tests whether giving a dexmedetomidine infusion during laparoscopic abdominal surgery can lower the amount of remifentanil needed during the operation.
-
Comparing ondansetron lozenge versus IV ondansetron to prevent shivering during cesarean section
This test will see if an ondansetron lozenge or IV ondansetron works better to prevent shivering in women having cesarean sections with spinal anesthesia.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.