Evaluating the 10-year performance of the MPACT DM hip prosthesis
Official title: Prospective, Multicenter, Non-Controlled, Non-Randomized, Open-Label Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Performance Of The Mpact® Dual Mobility Hemispheric Cup
Run by Medacta International SA · NCT05818891 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing how well the MPACT DM hip implant works over 10 years for people who have had hip replacement surgery.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 600 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Medacta International SA Industry-sponsored |
| Locations | 1 site (Dracy-le-Fort) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 5, 2018 |
| Main results expected | April 2028 |
| Study ends | April 2031 |
| Registry record updated | October 13, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT05818891 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are patients aged 18 to 80 who are eligible for first-line total hip replacement and meet the criteria for Medacta implants.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who may not benefit from this study include those requiring a transplant, those with significant comorbidities affecting recovery, or those with a BMI greater than 40 kg/m².
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This observational study aims to assess the long-term performance of the MPACT DM cup in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty over a 10-year period. The primary endpoint is the lifespan of the prosthesis, evaluated using the Kaplan Meier curve. Secondary objectives include assessing hip function, implant safety, and stability through various scoring systems and radiographic evaluations. The study will involve patients who meet specific eligibility criteria and will be monitored for their recovery and outcomes.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide valuable insights into the longevity and effectiveness of the MPACT DM hip prosthesis, potentially improving patient outcomes in hip replacement surgeries.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies evaluating the long-term performance of hip prostheses have shown success, indicating that this approach is supported by existing evidence.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient with a disease that meets the indications for use of Medacta implants (according to the instructions for use) 2. Patient eligible for first-line total hip replacement 3. Patient between 18 and 80 years of age 4. Patient covered by the Social Security system or an equivalent protection plan 5. Patient who is capable, in the opinion of the investigator, of fulfilling the requirements of the study Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient requiring a transplant 2. Patient with progressive local or systemic infection 3. Patient with muscle loss, neuromuscular disease, or vascular impairment of the affected limb making surgery unwarranted 4. Patient with known medical problems that may compromise independent recovery of mobility 5. Patient with a BMI greater than 40 kg/m². 6. Patient with major cognitive problems that do not allow a good understanding of the study requirements 7. Patient living in a geographical area that does not allow the study follow-up 8. Patient participating in interventional research. 9. Minor patient 10. Protected adult patient 11. Vulnerable person according to article L1121-6 of the Public Health Code 12. Pregnant or nursing woman.
Where it's running
-
Centre Orthopédique Médico-Chirurgical de Dracy Le Fort
Dracy-le-Fort, France Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Philippe DEROCHE — Centre Orthopédique Médico-Chirurgical de Dracy Le Fort
- Study coordinator: Arianna Girardi
- Email: girardi@medacta.ch
- Phone: +41 91 696 60 60
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Quadroiliac Plane Block vs Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block for Hip Replacement Pain
This study tests whether the Quadroiliac Plane Block provides better postoperative pain relief and lower opioid use than the transmuscular quadratus lumborum block after total hip arthroplasty conducted under spinal anesthesia.
-
Deep iliacus plane block vs transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for hip surgery pain relief
This study tests whether the deep iliacus plane block provides better pain relief and recovery than the transmuscular quadratus lumborum block after total hip replacement.
-
Analgesia after total hip replacement using SA-QLB vs PENG block
This study tests whether the SA-QLB or the PENG block provides better pain relief for adults having a total hip replacement.
-
Quadro‑Iliac Plane Block versus Erector Spinae Plane for pain after total hip replacement
This will test whether the quadro‑iliac plane block or the erector spinae plane block controls pain better after total hip replacement in adults having spinal anesthesia.
-
Ultrasound-guided Quadro-Iliac Plane block for pain after total hip replacement
This trial will test whether an ultrasound-guided Quadro-Iliac Plane (QIP) block reduces opioid use and pain in adults having elective primary total hip arthroplasty.
-
Intraoperative methadone for pain control after total hip replacement
This trial tests whether a single intraoperative IV dose of methadone lowers immediate postoperative pain and reduces opioid use in adults having elective total hip replacement with spinal anesthesia.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.