Evaluating ergonomic benefits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for hysterectomies
Official title: Ergonomic Benefits from Robotically Assisted Laparoscopy for Hysterectomies and Other Selected Indications in Comparison to Conventional Laparoscopy - an Explorative Study
Run by University Hospital Tuebingen · NCT06109753 · Data updated 2026-05-14
This study is no longer in our active list. It may have stopped recruiting or finished. The details below are as of 2026-05-14 and are kept for reference. Check ClinicalTrials.gov for its current status, or see similar studies below.
This study is testing if robot-assisted surgery for hysterectomies is easier on surgeons' bodies and minds compared to traditional surgery methods.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 68 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 4 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University Hospital Tuebingen Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg) |
| Trial ID | NCT06109753 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are trained surgeons aged 18 to 68 who are proficient in both robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic surgeries.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who are currently under the influence of analgesics or muscle relaxants, or those with acute diseases or muscle injuries, may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This observational clinical trial aims to assess the differences in musculoskeletal and cognitive demands between robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). Conducted at the University Hospital Tübingen, the study collects demographic data and utilizes surface electromyography (EMG), electrocardiography (ECG), and motion tracking during surgeries. Surgeons will also report on their perceived physical discomfort and mental load at various intervals throughout the procedure. The goal is to understand how these two surgical approaches impact surgeon ergonomics and overall performance.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved surgical techniques that reduce physical and mental strain on surgeons.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies with similar designs have shown promising results, indicating that this approach is grounded in established research.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age between 18 and 68 years * surgeons that are able to work in full shift * trained surgeons in RALS and CLS * written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * persons influenced by analgesics or muscle relaxants * persons not able to perform their common work for any reason * persons with acute diseases * muscle injury
Where it's running
-
University Women's Hospital
Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Benjamin Steinhilber, PD Dr. — Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research
- Study coordinator: Bernhard Krämer, Prof. Dr.
- Email: bernhard.kraemer@med.uni-tuebingen.de
- Phone: : +49 7071 29 82211
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Orthobiological Therapies for Musculoskeletal Conditions
This study tests whether orthobiological treatments like PRP, bone marrow concentrate, hyaluronic acid, and nanofat can help adults with various joint, tendon, cartilage, or bone problems.
-
Comparing single-level and three-level intertransverse process blocks for recovery after lung surgery
This study is testing whether a single-level or three-level pain block helps people recover better after lung surgery.
-
Evaluating stress management's impact on musculoskeletal health in employees
This study is testing if a six-week stress management program can help employees feel better physically and reduce time off work due to muscle and joint pain caused by stress.
-
Comparing two anesthesia techniques for upper extremity surgery
This study is testing whether a new ultrasound-guided anesthesia technique can provide better pain relief and fewer side effects than the traditional method for people having surgery on their arms.
-
Finding the smallest effective dose of local anesthetic for shoulder surgery
This study is testing the smallest amount of a local anesthetic to see if it can effectively reduce pain for people having shoulder surgery.
-
Comparing Lidocaine and Levobupivacaine for Sciatic Nerve Block in Foot Surgery
This study is testing which of two local anesthetics, Lidocaine or Levobupivacaine, works better for numbing the leg during foot surgery.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.