Evaluating different techniques for dental implant placement in patients with narrow jaw ridges
Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediate Dental Implants After Using Three Bone Splitting Techniques in Narrow Mandibular Alveolar Ridges: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
This study is testing three different methods for placing dental implants in patients with narrow jaw ridges to see which one helps improve bone width and implant success the most.
Quick facts
| Phase | Not applicable |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Enrollment | 36 (estimated) |
| Ages | 18 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Sponsor | Damascus University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Damascus) |
| Trial ID | NCT05720143 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
What this trial studies
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of three different bone splitting techniques—osseodensification, piezosurgery, and magnetic mallet—on ridge width gain during simultaneous dental implant placement in patients with narrow alveolar ridges. A total of 36 patients will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups, each receiving a different intervention after ridge splitting. The goal is to determine which technique provides the best outcomes in terms of bone width and overall implant success. This approach seeks to enhance patient satisfaction and improve functional and aesthetic results in dental rehabilitation.
Who should consider this trial
Good fit: Ideal candidates for this study are patients with a narrow alveolar ridge width of at least 3 mm who are free of conditions affecting bone metabolism.
Not a fit: Patients with severe concavity on the alveolar ridge, uncontrolled periodontal diseases, or those who have undergone head and neck radiotherapy may not benefit from this study.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved techniques for dental implant placement, resulting in better outcomes for patients with narrow jaw ridges.
How similar studies have performed: While similar techniques have been explored, this specific comparison of osseodensification, piezosurgery, and magnetic mallet in this context is relatively novel.
Eligibility criteria
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients who can to follow-up appointments. 2. Alveolar ridge width of at least 3 mm with sufficient height to place a regular implant. 3. Availability of spongy bone with at least 1 mm in width between the cortical plates. 4. Free of any underlying conditions that can impact bone metabolism. Exclusion Criteria: 1. The presence of severe concavity on the vestibular or palatal side of the alveolar ridge. 2. Patients with uncontrolled periodontal diseases. 3. Patients who have undergone radiotherapy in the head and neck area. 4. Smokers or patients with parafunction habits.
Where this trial is running
Damascus
- University of Damascus — Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic (Recruiting)
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Ahmad Albassal, MSc — Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus
- Study coordinator: ِِِِAhmad Albassal, MSc
- Email: dr.ahmad.bassal.91@gmail.com
- Phone: 0994391848
How to participate
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
- Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.