Evaluating a new surgical method for vulvar dysplasia treatment
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Study Evaluating the Effect of Frozen-Section Directed Excision on Positive Surgical Margins in High-grade Vulvar Dysplasia
Run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · NCT05934851 · Data updated 2026-05-14
This study is no longer in our active list. It may have stopped recruiting or finished. The details below are as of 2026-05-14 and are kept for reference. Check ClinicalTrials.gov for its current status, or see similar studies below.
This study is testing a new surgical method for treating vulvar dysplasia to see if it works better than the standard surgery for adults with this condition.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 112 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Wake Forest University Health Sciences Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Charlotte, North Carolina) |
| Trial ID | NCT05934851 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 and older with confirmed high-grade vulvar dysplasia who can undergo excisional surgery.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with anatomical issues preventing excision or those with known immunodeficiency may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study compares two surgical approaches for treating high-grade vulvar dysplasia: Frozen-Section Directed Excision and the standard Wide Local Excision. It is a randomized, single-blinded trial involving adults aged 18 and older with confirmed cases of vulvar neoplasia. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two surgical methods, and various outcomes such as surgery duration, pain medication usage, recurrence rates, and patient satisfaction will be assessed. The goal is to determine if the new method offers advantages over the standard approach.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction for those with vulvar dysplasia.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown promise with similar surgical approaches, but this specific comparison is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Written informed consent and HIPAA authorization for release of personal health information. 2. Age ≥ 18 years at the time of consent 3. Histological or cytological confirmation of VIN 2, VIN 3, VIN 2/3 or High-grade Dysplasia NOS with a planned excisional procedure, with high suspicion by the enrolling investigator that gross surgical margins of ≥ 3 mm can be achieved without laser or other destructive procedures 4. Surgery is expected to occur within 90 days from randomization 5. Ability to read and understand the English and/or Spanish language 6. As determined by the enrolling physician, ability and willingness of the subject to comply with study procedures for the entire length of the study 7. No known pregnancy Exclusion Criteria: 1. Excision is not possible due to anatomy (proximity to urethra/clitoris) 2. Known immunodeficiency syndrome 3. Immunosuppressant medications taken within the last 30 days (HIV, organ transplant recipient, chronic steroid use/immunosuppressant) 4. History of pelvic region radiation therapy 5. Active anticancer treatment
Where it's running
-
Levine Cancer Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Robert W Naumann, MD — Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Study coordinator: Alicia Patrick
- Email: alicia.patrick@atriumhealth.org
- Phone: 980-292-1746
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Cognitive changes after BCMA CAR-T in multiple myeloma
This study tests whether cognitive function changes over time in adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who receive BCMA CAR-T therapy.
-
Pelashield vs Xeroform for donor-site dressings in skin graft patients
A randomized, patient-treated trial tests whether Pelashield, a new skin graft dressing, can better control pain and improve donor-site appearance compared with the standard Xeroform in split-thickness skin grafts.
-
Optimizing how patients get blood pressure cuffs and how they log readings in primary care
We’re testing the best way to provide a standard, validated blood pressure cuff and the easiest way for patients to log their readings in routine primary care among adults with uncontrolled hypertension.
-
Two hospital-to-home transition programs for older adults and their family caregivers
Aims to see if adding family support to a patient-focused discharge plan helps older adults stay at home safely and reduces ER visits or hospital readmissions.
-
How well stroke patients move early after a severe stroke using a wearable
This study tests how adults with severe acute ischemic stroke move during their hospital stay by wearing a small activity monitor to see early mobility patterns.
-
LP-118 in combination with standard therapy for newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL
This study tests whether adding LP-118 to the standard therapy for adults with Philadelphia chromosome–positive ALL is safe and useful.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.