Evaluating 4-aminopyridine for nerve injury diagnosis
Official title: Pharmaco-Diagnostic Crossover Trial for Peripheral Nerve Continuity After Trauma
Run by University of Arizona · NCT06003166 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing if a single dose of 4-aminopyridine can help doctors better diagnose the severity of nerve injuries in people.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 2 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years to 90 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 68 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Arizona Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Tucson, Arizona) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 21, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2027 |
| Study ends | July 31, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | August 5, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06003166 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates include adults aged 18-90 with unclear continuity of peripheral nerves due to trauma affecting two or fewer limbs.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with distracting injuries or those scheduled for surgical exploration of the nerve within 48 hours may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial investigates the effectiveness of a single dose of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) in diagnosing the severity of peripheral nerve injuries, specifically distinguishing between severing and non-severing injuries. Participants will be randomized into two groups to receive either the drug or a placebo, followed by a crossover to the alternate treatment. The study will involve comprehensive sensory and motor evaluations, electrodiagnostic testing, and serum level assessments of 4-AP over a three-hour period. The goal is to determine if 4-AP can expedite the identification of incomplete nerve injuries compared to standard diagnostic methods.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to faster and more accurate diagnoses of peripheral nerve injuries, improving patient outcomes.
How similar studies have gone: While the use of 4-AP in this context is novel, similar studies have shown promise in enhancing nerve injury assessments.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with trauma involving two or less limbs where the continuity of a given peripheral nerve or nerves is unclear on presenting physical examination. * Closed soft tissue envelope obscuring direct observation of the continuity of the affected nerve. * Cognitive ability to report sensory and motor deficit during examination. * Eligible for standard of care plan of monitoring vs surgical exploration of the nerve. * Adults subject aged 18-90 * Known limb trauma which resulted in nerve injury (aim 1) or post-operative/post intervention nerve injury (aim 2). * Ability to give written informed consent. * Availability for all testing days and main trial day. Exclusion Criteria: * Distracting injury which prevents adequate examination. * Plan for surgical exploration of the nerve during the ensuing 48 hours. * Plan for surgical exploration of the nerve as part of another surgical procedure within 48 hours of evaluation. * Intoxication during examination or evidence of cognitive deficit that emerges during examination. * History of multiple sclerosis, stroke or any other diagnosed neurological disorder * History of hypersensitivity to AMPYRA® or 4-aminopyridine * Current use of aminopyridine medications, including other compounded 4-AP * Renal impairment based on calculated GFR (GFR\<80 mL/min). This laboratory value is measured in all inpatient trauma patients as part of the standard of care. * History of difficult compliance with timely follow up or plan to seek care at another institution closer to home. * Patients outside the age range or unable to consent. * Patients with a known history of a seizure disorder (4AP overdose can, in selected cases, result in limited seizure activity). * Patients with a concomitant traumatic brain injury. * Patients unable to communicate return or loss of sensation. * Patients unable to exhibit motor control on the affected limb at baseline. * Patients unwilling to complete the study requirements. * Patients with injuries too extensive to isolate a single nerve(s) for testing. * Patients currently taking organic cat-ion transporter 2 (OCT2) inhibitors, e.g. Cimetidine. * Pregnancy, breastfeeding or incarcerated individuals.
Where it's running
-
Banner University Medical Center
Tucson, Arizona, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: John Elfar, MD — University of Arizona
- Study coordinator: Andrea Horne
- Email: ahh@arizona.edu
- Phone: 520-626-6456
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Avance Nerve Graft vs. Sural Nerve Autograft for Mixed and Motor Nerve Repair in the Arm
This study tests whether Avance Nerve Graft can match or exceed the outcomes of sural nerve autograft for restoring function after mixed or motor nerve injuries in the upper limb.
-
Using patients' own Schwann cells to improve recovery from severe nerve injuries
This study is testing if using patients' own Schwann cells along with nerve grafts can help people with severe nerve injuries recover better.
-
Diagnosing malignant pleural effusion with the EPISEEK-MPE liquid biopsy
A test called EPISEEK-MPE is being checked to see if it can tell cancer from non-cancer pleural effusions using fluid already removed for care.
-
Linking social care with healthcare to help manage chronic diseases
This trial tests whether pairing patients with trained community health workers can help them get transportation, healthy food, information, and better access to care to improve health in conditions like hypertension, diabetes, and high cholesterol.
-
Apixaban vs Warfarin for a Left Ventricular Thrombus
This study tests whether apixaban can more conveniently and safely dissolve a left ventricular blood clot compared with warfarin.
-
Breathing for Two: Can inspiratory muscle training help with blood pressure in late pregnancy?
This study tests whether a home-based inspiratory muscle strength training program can safely lower blood pressure in pregnant people in their third trimester.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.