EMR vs. ESD for Barrett's lesions with dysplasia or early cancer
Official title: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Endoscopic subMucosal Dissection fOr Removal of Visible Lesions in Barrett's Esophagus With Early Neoplasia: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by St. Antonius Hospital · NCT05276791 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether EMR or ESD is better at removing visible Barrett's lesions with dysplasia or early cancer.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 331 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | St. Antonius Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 6 sites (Amsterdam and 5 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 17, 2023 |
| Main results expected | December 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 1, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | June 29, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT05276791 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (≥18) with Barrett's esophagus and a visible lesion without suspected submucosal invasion, eligible for EMR or ESD.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with submucosal invasion, prior esophageal surgery, or ablation history may not benefit from this comparison.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
In this randomized trial, adults with Barrett's esophagus and a visible lesion are assigned to either endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to remove the lesion, with 12 months of follow-up and no ablation during that period. The main goal is to see what proportion of patients have no residual or locally recurrent neoplasia after treatment. Participants must have no signs of submucosal invasion and must be willing to undergo either procedure. Prior endoscopic resections are allowed, and the study is conducted across multiple centers.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could identify which technique provides better long-term local control for Barrett's neoplasia.
How similar studies have gone: Previous qualitative data favor EMR for accessibility, but this trial explores whether the more controlled ESD offers superior outcomes for visible lesions.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patients age: ≥ 18 years
* Willingness to undergo both EMR or ESD
* Ability to provide written, informed consent (approved by IRB) and understand the responsibilities of trial participation
* BE with at least one visible lesion ("target lesion") with absence of signs of submucosal invasion on endoscopy, after evaluation by the adjudication committee
* Multiple lesions are allowed as long as the lesions are considered eligible for endoscopic treatment. Only the target lesion is evaluated for the study
* Prior endoscopic resection is allowed
Exclusion Criteria:
* Patients with visible lesions with suspicion of submucosal invasion based on assessment of the adjudication committee
* Patients with HGD in at least one random biopsy, before inclusion (i.e. during endoscopy in the referring center \<3 months before imaging, or during imaging endoscopy)
* History of esophageal surgery other than fundoplication
* History of esophageal ablation therapy
* In case of prior endoscopic resection, the target lesion located within 1 cm of the prior resection site
* Uncontrolled coagulopathy with INR \>2.0, thrombocytopenia with platelet counts \< 50,000
* Esophageal varix or varices
* Subject has a known history of unresolved drug or alcohol dependency that would limit ability to comprehend or follow instructions related to informed consent, post-treatment instructions, or follow-up guidelines
* Life expectancy \<2 years
Where it's running
-
Amsterdam University Medical Center
Amsterdam, Netherlands Recruiting -
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, Netherlands Recruiting -
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, Netherlands Recruiting -
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein, Netherlands Recruiting -
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, Netherlands Recruiting -
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, Netherlands Recruiting
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
PF-08098488 in adults with advanced solid tumors
This study tests PF-08098488 in adults whose cancer has progressed or returned after prior treatment.
-
Modular Robot-Assisted Esophagectomy vs. Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
This trial tests whether modular robotic-assisted esophagectomy using the Carina platform works better than conventional 3D thoracoscopic esophagectomy for people with resectable esophageal cancer.
-
MGC030 in adults with advanced solid tumors
This trial tests MGC030 in adults with advanced urothelial, gastric/GEJ, esophageal, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, or GEJ cancers to see if it is safe and whether it can shrink tumors or stop growth.
-
Adding 2141-V11 to standard therapy for advanced esophageal, gastric, or gastroesophageal junction cancer
This study tests whether adding the drug 2141-V11 to standard anti-PD-1 therapy (with or without 5-FU) is safe for adults with advanced or metastatic esophageal, gastric, or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
-
TS-104: a first-in-human, dose-escalation study for advanced solid tumors
This study tests TS-104, a peptide-drug conjugate, as a single therapy in adults with advanced solid tumors like NSCLC, HNSCC, esophageal, gastric, ovarian, or endometrial cancer to see if it is safe and tolerable and whether it shows any benefit.
-
First-in-human STRO-006 in adults with certain recurrent or metastatic solid tumors
This study tests STRO-006 alone and with pembrolizumab in adults with certain head and neck, lung, esophageal, gastric, colorectal cancers to see if it is safe and shows early anticancer activity.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.