Electroporation for early AF treatment in people with HFpEF
Official title: Electroporation Treatment for Early AF Management in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) Pilot Study
Run by Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien · NCT07385417 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study will test whether electroporation pulmonary vein isolation using the FARAPULSE system works better than usual medical treatment for people with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who also have HFpEF.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 200 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | chemotherapy, radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Frankfurt am Main) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 12, 2023 |
| Main results expected | April 12, 2026 |
| Study ends | April 12, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | February 4, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07385417 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults 18–80 years old with symptomatic paroxysmal AF, HFpEF (EF >50%), left atrial diameter <55 mm, and no contraindication to pulmonary vein isolation who can provide informed consent.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with persistent or long-standing AF, major comorbidities limiting life expectancy, contraindications to PVI, or concurrent enrollment in other interventional trials are unlikely to benefit from this pilot.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a prospective, randomized, single-center feasibility pilot enrolling 200 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF and HFpEF. Per protocol, 100 patients will undergo FARAPULSE electroporation pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and 100 will receive standard medical treatment for AF. All patients will receive detailed informed consent including risks, benefits, and study rationale before randomization, with follow-up to capture symptoms, rhythm outcomes, and safety events. The study aims to determine feasibility and preliminary comparative outcomes of electroporation PVI versus medical therapy in this HFpEF population.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the electroporation procedure could reduce AF episodes and symptoms and potentially improve quality of life for people with HFpEF.
How similar studies have gone: Pulsed-field electroporation (FARAPULSE) has shown promising safety and rhythm outcomes in prior AF studies, but its focused use in HFpEF patients is novel and not well studied.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Seeking emergency (E) treatment including emergency room (ER) presentation
2. Paroxysmal AF diagnosed according to current ESC guidelines
3. Diagnosis of HFpEF according to ESC guidelines 2021 (clinical symptoms, EF\>50%, objective evidence of functional abnormality: LV diastolic dysfunction, NT-proBNP (non acute setting): sinus rhythm: 125pg/ml or AF: 365pg/ml, vs. acute HF: \>450 pg/ml if aged \<55 years, \>900 pg/ml if aged between 55 and 75 years and \>1800 pg/ml if \>75ys.
4. Age between 18 and 80 years
5. Left atrial size, LA \< 55mm
6. Left ventricular ejection fraction, EF \>50%
7. Patients able to provide informed consent and willing to comply with all pre-, post- and follow up requirements as per study protocol -
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Currently participating in an interventional (drug, device, biologic, etc.) clinical trial
2. Any disease that limits life expectancy to less than one year
3. Contraindications for PVI
4. Contraindication for AAD therapy
5. Active systemic infection
6. Thrombocytosis, thrombocytopenia
7. Known pre-existing hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis
8. Any untreated or uncontrolled hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism
9. Reduced immune function or otherwise at high risk for infection per physician discretion
10. Active malignancy or history of chemotherapy or radiation treatment
11. Prior left atrial ablation or surgical procedure (including left atrial appendage closures)
12. Any cardiac surgery, myocardial infarction, PCI/PTCA or coronary artery stenting which occurred within the 3 months before the eligibility assessment
13. Instable angina pectoris
14. Primary pulmonary hypertension
15. Any condition contraindicating chronic anticoagulation
16. Any cerebral ischemic event (strokes or TIAs) which occurred within the 3 months before the consent date
17. Presence of any cardiac prosthetic valves
18. Left atrial diameter \> 55 mm (anteroposterior) by TTE
19. Presence of any pulmonary vein stents
20. Presence of any pre-existing pulmonary vein stenosis (identified by CT or MRI and defined as at least 70% reduction of the PV diameter)
21. Endocarditis, pericarditis or pericardial effusion
22. Pregnant or breastfeeding women or women of childbearing potential not on adequate birth control.
23. Substance abuse
24. Unwilling to follow the study protocol and to attend follow-up visits
\-
Where it's running
-
Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien
Frankfurt am Main, Germany Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Julian Chun, Professor — Mvz Ccb
- Study coordinator: Julian Chun, Professor
- Email: j.chun@ccb.de
- Phone: +49 69 945028
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Pulsed Field vs Cryoballoon for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation can shorten the procedure for first-time PVI in AF patients compared with cryoballoon ablation, while keeping safety and effectiveness similar.
-
Pulsed Field Ablation vs Cryoablation for Atrial Fibrillation Under Deep Sedation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation (PFA) done under deep sedation works as well as cryoballoon ablation for treating atrial fibrillation, aiming to avoid general anesthesia.
-
Bachmann’s Bundle Pacing vs Right Atrial Appendage Pacing for AF
This study tests two common atrial pacing methods to see which one is safer over 12 months for people getting a new pacemaker, ICD, or CRT device.
-
AI-powered ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes in heart disease
Researchers test an AI-enhanced ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes for people with cardiovascular diseases.
-
Pace-and-ablate strategy in atrial fibrillation: who benefits and long-term outcomes
This study looks at adults with atrial fibrillation who underwent AV node ablation with permanent pacing to see who develops pacing-induced problems and how they do long-term.
-
AI-based cardiac analysis using 12-lead and 1-lead ECG
A clinician-facing pilot test to see if SmartECG-EF helps evaluate heart function using both 12-lead and single-lead ECGs in adults with heart conditions.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.