Effect of surgical position on kidney stone removal success
Official title: Does the Positioning in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Affect Stone-Free Rates? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by Ondokuz Mayıs University · NCT06809582 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether changing the way patients are positioned during kidney stone surgery can help doctors remove stones more successfully and with fewer complications.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 128 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Ondokuz Mayıs University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Samsun) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 1, 2025 |
| Study ends | June 1, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | August 15, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06809582 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 and older with single or multiple kidney stones measuring 2 cm or less.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with severe cardiovascular disease, congenital kidney anomalies, or active urinary tract infections may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial investigates how the surgical position during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) influences the success rate of removing kidney stones in adults. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a standard lithotomy position or a modified lithotomy position, which includes a 30-degree Trendelenburg tilt. The study aims to compare stone-free rates and complication rates between the two positions after the procedure. Follow-up imaging will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the surgical approach.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved surgical techniques and higher success rates in kidney stone removal.
How similar studies have gone: While there is limited data on this specific comparison, similar studies have explored surgical positioning in urology with varying results.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Presence of single or multiple kidney stones, with the largest stone ≤2 cm * Age ≥18 years * Provided written informed consent to participate in the study * Indicated for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) as a treatment approach Exclusion Criteria: * Severe cardiovascular disease (e.g., heart failure) * Congenital kidney anomalies (e.g., horseshoe kidney, ectopic kidney) * Concurrent ureteral stones * Pregnancy or planning pregnancy * History of previous kidney surgery on the same side * Active urinary tract infection (UTI) * Coagulopathy or use of anticoagulant therapy that cannot be stopped before surgery
Where it's running
-
Ondokuz Mayıs University
Samsun, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Murat Gulsen — Ondokuz Mayıs University
- Study coordinator: Murat Gulsen
- Email: mglotr@gmail.com
- Phone: +905062357421
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Mini‑PCNL versus flexible ureteroscopy with a suction sheath for 2–3 cm kidney stones
This tests whether mini‑PCNL or flexible ureteroscopy with a suction sheath better clears 2–3 cm kidney stones and leads to fewer complications in adults.
-
Stone clearance with steerable ureteroscopic evacuation compared with other methods
This study tests whether the CVAC/SURE approach helps clear kidney stones more effectively than standard renal-stone interventions in patients needing ureteroscopy or PCNL.
-
Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation (SURE) with CVAC vs standard ureteroscopy
This trial tests whether the SURE system with CVAC can improve outcomes compared with standard ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy for kidney stones in adult patients.
-
Flexible navigable suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional sheath for retrograde kidney stone removal
This trial will test whether a flexible, navigable suction ureteral access sheath works better than a traditional sheath for people 14 and older having retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney or ureteral stones up to 2 cm.
-
Evaluating a new patient position for kidney stone surgery
This study is testing if a new way of positioning patients during kidney stone surgery can help them get rid of stones more effectively than the usual position.
-
Aminophylline to help ureteric access sheath placement during flexible ureteroscopy
This trial will test whether putting aminophylline into the ureter before flexible ureteroscopy helps place the ureteric access sheath and reduces ureteric injuries for patients with upper ureter or kidney stones smaller than 2 cm.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.