Early versus later restart of blood thinners after surgery for chronic subdural hematoma in people with atrial fibrillation
Official title: Restarting Early Versus Later Anticoagulation for Chronic Subdural Hematoma With Atrial Fibrillation (RELACS): An International Multicenter, Randomized Controlled, Two-arm, Assessor-blinded, Trial
Run by Helsinki University Central Hospital · NCT06696079 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether restarting oral blood thinners 5 days versus 30 days after surgery is safer and better at preventing clots for adults with atrial fibrillation who had surgery for chronic subdural hematoma.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 332 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Helsinki University Central Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 6 sites (Oulu, North Ostrobothnia and 5 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 7, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 2026 |
| Study ends | June 2027 |
| Registry record updated | August 22, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06696079 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (≥18) with known spontaneous atrial fibrillation who were on an oral anticoagulant and underwent burr-hole evacuation with drainage for symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma, with randomization within 4 days of surgery, are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with intraoperative or immediate postoperative hemorrhagic complications, those requiring craniotomy or other non–burr-hole surgery, recent prior CSDH surgery within 12 months, cerebrospinal fluid shunts, CSDH within an arachnoid cyst, or whose hematoma is found to be a hygroma are unlikely to be eligible or to benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized trial assigns adults with atrial fibrillation who undergo burr-hole evacuation for symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma to resume their oral anticoagulant either 5 days or 30 days after surgery. Participants are followed for three months to record thromboembolic events, bleeding complications, need for reoperation, functional outcomes, mortality, and healthcare use. The study uses standard clinical management apart from the timing of anticoagulation resumption and analyzes outcomes between the two groups. Results aim to clarify whether earlier anticoagulation reduces clot-related events without increasing harm.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, earlier resumption could reduce strokes and other clotting events after surgery without increasing bleeding or reoperation, improving recovery and reducing healthcare use.
How similar studies have gone: Observational studies and retrospective series have suggested timing of anticoagulation influences outcomes, but randomized evidence specific to chronic subdural hematoma is limited and results have been mixed.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 years. * Patients with a symptomatic unilateral or bilateral CSDH requiring burr-hole evacuation with drainage (CSDH is predominantly hypodense or isodense on imaging \[CT/MRI\]; clinical symptoms attributable to the CSDH; patients with bilaterally operated CSDHs will be treated with the same protocol on both sides and analyzed as a single study participant). * Patients that are on an oral anticoagulation medication due to permanent, persistent or paroxysmal spontaneous atrial fibrillation previously known * Randomization done within 4 days of the surgery Exclusion Criteria: * Intraoperative or immediate postoperative hemorrhagic complication * CSDH requiring surgical treatment other than burr-hole evacuation (e.g. craniotomy) * Prior CSDH surgery within 12 months * Cerebrospinal fluid shunt * CSDH is in an arachnoid cyst * If the operated hematoma is revealed to be a cerebrospinal fluid collection (hygroma) * Conditions other than atrial fibrillation that require anticoagulation, including therapeutical dose of low molecular-weight heparin or heparin (for example, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, hypercoagulability syndromes) * Mechanical heart valve(s) * Moderate or severe mitral stenosis (other valvular diseases and biological valves are eligible) * Contraindication to anticoagulation medication (for example bleeding disorder, documented high risk of fall \[e.g. due to severe alcoholism\], severe thrombocytopenia, severe anemia) * Concomitant use of antiplatelet medication * Moderate to severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \<30 ml/min or on dialysis) * Not a permanent resident in Finland (for Finnish patients) or not a permanent resident in Region Stockholm (for Swedish patients)
Where it's running
-
Helsinki University Hospital
Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland Recruiting -
Oulu University Hospital
Oulu, North Ostrobothnia, Finland Not yet recruiting -
Kuopio University Hospital
Kuopio, Northern Savonia, Finland Not yet recruiting -
Tampere University Hospital
Tampere, Pirkanmaa, Finland Not yet recruiting -
Turku University Hospital
Turku, Southwest Finland, Finland Not yet recruiting -
Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, Region Stockholm, Sweden Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Jarno Satopää, MD, PhD — Helsinki University Hospital & University of Helsinki
- Study coordinator: Rahul Raj, MD, PhD
- Email: rahul.raj@hus.fi
- Phone: +358504272516
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Pulsed Field vs Cryoballoon for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation can shorten the procedure for first-time PVI in AF patients compared with cryoballoon ablation, while keeping safety and effectiveness similar.
-
Pulsed Field Ablation vs Cryoablation for Atrial Fibrillation Under Deep Sedation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation (PFA) done under deep sedation works as well as cryoballoon ablation for treating atrial fibrillation, aiming to avoid general anesthesia.
-
Bachmann’s Bundle Pacing vs Right Atrial Appendage Pacing for AF
This study tests two common atrial pacing methods to see which one is safer over 12 months for people getting a new pacemaker, ICD, or CRT device.
-
AI-powered ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes in heart disease
Researchers test an AI-enhanced ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes for people with cardiovascular diseases.
-
Pace-and-ablate strategy in atrial fibrillation: who benefits and long-term outcomes
This study looks at adults with atrial fibrillation who underwent AV node ablation with permanent pacing to see who develops pacing-induced problems and how they do long-term.
-
AI-based cardiac analysis using 12-lead and 1-lead ECG
A clinician-facing pilot test to see if SmartECG-EF helps evaluate heart function using both 12-lead and single-lead ECGs in adults with heart conditions.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.