Early rhythm control treatment for subclinical atrial fibrillation
Official title: Efficacy of Early Rhythm Control Therapy in Patients With Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation
Run by Samsung Medical Center · NCT07447297 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether starting rhythm-control treatments early can reduce abnormal heart rhythm episodes in people whose subclinical atrial fibrillation was found by implantable heart devices.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 19 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 520 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Samsung Medical Center Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | chemotherapy, radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Seoul, Seoul) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 2, 2024 |
| Main results expected | December 15, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | March 3, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07447297 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults (≥19 years) with CIED-detected atrial high rate episodes totaling over 21 hours in three months and without ECG-confirmed AF in the past year.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who already have ECG-confirmed atrial fibrillation, have very low device-detected AHRE burden, or cannot safely receive antiarrhythmic drugs or ablation may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized, multicenter, prospective interventional study will assign adults with device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation to early rhythm control or general management in a 1:1 ratio. Early rhythm control may include antiarrhythmic drugs, electrical cardioversion, or catheter ablation, while the control group receives usual care without those rhythm-control interventions. Participants will be followed with clinic visits every three months and device monitoring to compare whether early rhythm control reduces atrial fibrillation burden by at least 50% or lowers the incidence of clinically documented AF. Eligible subjects are adults with cardiac implantable electronic devices who had atrial high rate episodes totaling more than 21 hours during a three-month observation and no ECG-confirmed AF within the prior year.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, early rhythm control could lower arrhythmia burden and reduce progression to clinically evident atrial fibrillation and its complications.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown benefit of early rhythm control in patients with clinically detected AF, but applying rhythm-control strategies to device-detected subclinical AF is largely untested.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Among patients with Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED), subjects with atrial high rate episodes found Cardiac implantable electronic devices: implantable loop recorder, pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator(ICD), cardiac resynchronized therapy(CRT) * Patients aged 19 or older who have agreed to the study (if voluntary consent is deemed difficult, consent from legal representatives is obtained together) * If the accumulated period of the atrial high rate episode during the three-month observation period is more than 21 hours * Patients whose atrial fibrillation has not been confirmed by electrocardiogram or holter monitoring within the past year from the time atrial high rate episode was detected However, enrollment is possible even if it includes one of the following two cases ⓐ Patients diagnosed and recorded as atrial fibrillation on medical records but not confirmed by electrocardiogram or holter monitoring ⓑ If there is a record of atrial fibrillation, but Paroxysmal AF less than 30 seconds Exclusion Criteria: * Patients deemed inappropriate to participate in the study by the investigator * Patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation with 12-lead electrocardiogram or holter within the past year prior to participation in the study * Patients taking Class Ic, III of antiarrhythmic drugs prior to study participation * Patients who have had rhythm control treatments such as Radiofequency catheter ablation (RFCA), Total thoracoscopic ablation (TTA), Maze procedure (MAZEop), and antiarrhythmic treatment due to atrial fibrillation (except for CTI ablation with AFL) * Patients whose life expectancy is less than one year (e.g., patients who can't even have a heart transplant, patients who receive DNR, Patients in hospice wards who refuse life-sustaining treatment, terminal cancer patients who cannot receive radiation or chemotherapy, etc.)
Where it's running
-
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, Seoul, South Korea Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Ju Youn Kim, Clinical assistant professor, MD, Ph.D
- Email: kzzoo921@gmail.com
- Phone: 82-2-3410-3419
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
ICE-guided cavotricuspid isthmus ablation with a circular pulsed-field catheter
This will see if a circular-shaped pulsed field ablation catheter, guided by intracardiac echocardiography, can safely and effectively achieve acute cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in adults with atrial fibrillation.
-
Tracking outcomes after heart rhythm procedures in Düsseldorf.
This registry collects information to see how safe and effective routine electrophysiology procedures (like catheter ablation and cardioversion) are for people treated for AF, atrial flutter, supraventricular tachycardias, or VT at University Hospital Düsseldorf.
-
Pulsed field ablation registry for atrial arrhythmias in Poland.
This project will collect information to see how well pulsed field ablation works and how safe it is for people in Poland having ablation for atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia.
-
Using a quick CT scan to check for left atrial clots before cardioversion in the Emergency Department
This will test whether a rapid cardiac CT in the ED to look for left atrial clots lets people with symptomatic atrial fibrillation or flutter have safe same‑day cardioversion instead of being admitted or delayed.
-
Comparing LAA closure and anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation patients after brain bleeding
This study is testing whether closing a part of the heart or using blood thinners is better for preventing strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation who have had a brain bleed.
-
Pulsed Field vs Cryoballoon for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation can shorten the procedure for first-time PVI in AF patients compared with cryoballoon ablation, while keeping safety and effectiveness similar.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.