Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Observational Ages 18 to 45 Women only

Drug-assisted expectant care versus surgery for retained products of conception

Official title: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Real-world Study of Retained Products of Conception

Run by The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · NCT07421895 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This project tests whether trying drug-assisted expectant management and waiting for the right time for surgery in people with retained products of conception reduces intrauterine scarring and better preserves fertility compared with immediate curettage.

More Retained Products of Conception trials

Quick facts

Study typeObservational
Ages18 Years to 45 Years
SexWomen only
Enrollment600 (estimated)
SponsorThe Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Changsha, Hunan)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJune 1, 2022
Main results expectedDecember 31, 2027
Study endsDecember 31, 2032
Registry record updatedFebruary 19, 2026
Trial IDNCT07421895 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are people with clinically diagnosed retained products of conception, an ultrasound lesion at least 0.5 cm in diameter, and no active bleeding, obvious infection, or severe organ dysfunction.

Probably not a fit

Patients with active heavy bleeding, clear infection, or severe organ dysfunction are unlikely to benefit from expectant management and will require immediate or alternative care.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This is a prospective multicenter observational real-world study conducted at hospitals in Hunan, China. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of retained products of conception and an ultrasound lesion ≥0.5 cm will be followed after receiving either uterine curettage or drug-assisted expectant management until the clinician decides on surgery timing. The study will record rates of intrauterine adhesions and other fertility-related outcomes, as well as need for repeat procedures, infection, and bleeding. Patients with active bleeding requiring immediate surgery, obvious infection, or severe organ dysfunction are excluded and data will be used to compare real-world safety and effectiveness of the two approaches.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could reduce intrauterine adhesions and help preserve future fertility by avoiding or better timing surgery.

How similar studies have gone: Some prior case series and observational reports suggest expectant or medical management can reduce immediate surgical interventions, but evidence that such approaches lower intrauterine adhesion rates is limited and mixed.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:Clinical diagnosis of retained products of conception, and ultrasound indicated that the maximum diameter of the lesion ≥0.5cm.

Exclusion Criteria:1) There is active bleeding requiring immediate surgical intervention;2) combined with obvious infection;3) Combined with severe organ dysfunction, including coagulation dysfunction.

Where it's running

  • The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
    Changsha, Hunan, China
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.