Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 and up

Distinguishing N2a from N2b lymph node spread during EBUS-TBNA and whether changing the needle helps

Official title: Discrimination of N2a and N2b by EBUS-TBNA: is a Needle Change Necessary? - a Prospective Pilot Study

Run by University of Vienna · NCT07418450 · Data updated 2026-11-12

It will see if changing the EBUS-TBNA needle between lymph nodes helps doctors tell apart N2a from N2b in people having mediastinal staging for suspected or confirmed lung cancer.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment30 (estimated)
SponsorUniversity of Vienna
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Vienna)
StatusRecruiting
StartedNovember 5, 2025
Main results expectedMay 2027
Study endsMay 2027
Registry record updatedFebruary 18, 2026
Trial IDNCT07418450 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are people with a pulmonary lesion suspicious for or already diagnosed as lung cancer who are scheduled for EBUS-TBNA mediastinal staging and can undergo bronchoscopy at the participating center.

Probably not a fit

Patients not undergoing EBUS-TBNA mediastinal staging, those who cannot safely undergo bronchoscopy, or those whose nodal status is already established by other means are unlikely to benefit from participation.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

Participants undergoing EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal staging will have two sequential rounds of sampling: one round with a new needle for each sampled lymph node and a second round using the same needle across nodes. Collected cytology and pathology will be compared to determine whether needle change affects the ability to distinguish single‑station (N2a) from multi‑station (N2b) mediastinal nodal involvement. The trial enrolls patients with a pulmonary lesion suspicious for or already diagnosed as lung cancer who have an indication for mediastinal staging. Outcomes likely include diagnostic classification and measures of sample quality and potential cross‑contamination.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the results could simplify and speed up mediastinal staging by showing whether needle changes are necessary, potentially reducing procedure time, needle use and cost without lowering diagnostic accuracy.

How similar studies have gone: Direct evidence comparing needle change versus no change for discriminating N2a versus N2b is limited, making this a relatively novel procedural question though related work on needle passes and contamination is sparse and inconclusive.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Pulmonary lesion suspicious for lung cancer or histologically confirmed lung cancer
* indication for mediastinal staging

Exclusion Criteria:

\-

Where it's running

  • Medical University of Vienna
    Vienna, Austria
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.