Core stability, postural balance, and flexibility in women who practice Pilates versus sedentary women
Official title: Core Stability, Postural Balance, and Flexibility in Healthy Women: A Comparative Study Between Pilates Practitioners and Sedentary Individuals
Run by Istinye University · NCT07578714 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This will see if women who do Pilates regularly have stronger core muscles, better balance, and greater flexibility than women who are mostly sedentary.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years to 45 Years |
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 55 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Istinye University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Istanbul, Zeytinburnu) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 13, 2026 |
| Main results expected | March 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | March 13, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | May 11, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07578714 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Healthy women aged 20–45 who either practice Pilates regularly (minimum six months, about twice weekly sessions) or who meet criteria for a sedentary lifestyle are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Women who are currently pregnant, less than six months postpartum, or who had recent surgery to the spine, pelvis, or lower limbs are unlikely to benefit or be eligible for this comparison.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a cross-sectional comparison of 55 healthy women split into a Pilates group and a sedentary control group, with the Pilates group required to have regular practice for at least six months. Physical performance measures include deep muscle activation using a Pressure Biofeedback Unit (PBU), core endurance via the McGill battery, dynamic balance with the Y-Balance Test, static balance with single-leg stance, and flexibility with the Sit-and-Reach test. An assessor-blinding protocol keeps the evaluator unaware of group allocation to reduce measurement bias. Results will be compared between groups using IBM SPSS v26.0 statistical analyses.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the findings could support Pilates as a practical way to improve core stability, balance, and flexibility for healthy women.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies generally show positive but mixed evidence that Pilates improves core endurance, balance, and flexibility, though high-quality randomized trials are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Healthy female volunteers aged 20-45. 2. For the Pilates group: having practiced mat Pilates, reformer Pilates, or any equipment-based Pilates discipline for at least 6 months; attending regular 60-minute sessions at least twice a week with a certified instructor. 3. For the control group: having a sedentary lifestyle (weekly moderate physical activity time less than 150 minutes). 4. Objectively demonstrating sedentary status using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ); only participants in the "low physical activity" category will be included in the control group. 5. Having full cognitive ability to understand, follow, and execute all physical assessment instructions. 6. Willingness to voluntarily sign the informed consent form prior to the study. Exclusion Criteria: 1. History of any surgery involving the spine, pelvis, or lower extremities within the last 12 months prior to the study. 2. Currently pregnant or less than 6 months postpartum. 3. Diagnosed vestibular disorders or chronic clinical balance disorders. 4. History of neurological disease (MS, Parkinson's, etc.) or systemic metabolic disorder (diabetes, etc.). 5. Having a pain intensity greater than 2/10 on the visual analog scale (VAS) in the lower back or lower extremities. 6. Professional sports history or participation in other exercise programs exceeding 3 hours per week (excluding Pilates for the Pilates group). 7. Acute musculoskeletal injuries or acute illnesses that may affect energy levels on the day of evaluation. 8. Concurrent participation in other intensive core strengthening programs such as "advanced yoga" that may affect results.
Where it's running
-
Istinye University, Topkapi Campus
Istanbul, Zeytinburnu, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: WALA Abbas Mohammed TAHA, PT specialist
- Email: 2433095066@stu.istinye.edu.tr
- Phone: +905384112497
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Reactive Balance Training vs Task-Oriented Training for Postural Stability in Diabetic Neuropathy
This trial tests whether Reactive Balance Training or Task-Oriented Training improves postural stability in adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
-
Horse Riding Simulator Added to Core Exercises in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis
In adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis, adding a horse riding simulator to a core stabilization program is being tested to see if it improves breathing muscle strength, balance, quality of life, and how they feel about their posture.
-
Pelvic Control Training with Biofeedback vs Core Stability for Non-Specific Low Back Pain
This trial tests whether pelvic control training using a pressure biofeedback unit helps people with non-specific low back pain more than standard core stability exercises.
-
Diaphragmatic Breathing Training in Combat Sport Athletes with Dysfunctional Breathing
This study tests whether diaphragmatic breathing training can improve breathing patterns, core stability, and sport-related performance in combat sport athletes with dysfunctional breathing.
-
Balance and gait in multiple sclerosis: linking motion data to function
Researchers will see if precise motion measurements of balance and walking relate to everyday functional tests in adults with MS.
-
Reactive balance training vs. conventional balance training for tennis players
In competitive tennis players, this study tests whether reactive balance training improves dynamic stability and change-of-direction performance more than traditional balance training over six weeks.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.