Contrast-enhanced mammography versus MRI for breast surveillance in high-risk women
Official title: Comparison Between Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Surveillance of High-Risk Women for Breast Cancer: The Randomized Controlled Trial 'Con-trust. Funded by European Commission NextGenerationEU - Ministero Della Salute PNRR: M6/C2_CALL 2023 Full Proposal
Run by Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS · NCT06629896 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether contrast-enhanced mammography can replace MRI plus digital mammography for annual breast screening in women aged 35–60 with a five-year breast cancer risk of ≥5%.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 35 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 2200 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS Government |
| Drugs / interventions | Radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Reggio Emilia, Italy/Reggio Emilia) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | July 7, 2028 |
| Study ends | January 7, 2030 |
| Registry record updated | May 7, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06629896 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Women aged 35–60 with an estimated five‑year breast cancer risk of ≥5% who can attend one of the participating Italian centers and do not have prior breast cancer or bilateral mastectomy are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Women with prior breast cancer, bilateral mastectomy, pregnancy, psychiatric or other conditions preventing compliance, or those unable to be followed for at least two years are unlikely to benefit from this screening substitution.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The Con-TRUST randomized trial will enroll 1,400 women across 10 Italian centers and randomize participants to screening with contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus standard MRI plus digital mammography (DM). Women will undergo two screening rounds and be followed for 2.5 years to capture cancer incidence, recall rates, and other outcomes. Primary comparisons focus on cancer incidence after a negative baseline screen and cumulative recall rates over two rounds, while secondary outcomes include screening performance measures, safety, adherence, and cost analyses. The project incorporates centralized quality control for imaging, machine-learning risk prediction work, and evidence synthesis to inform guideline recommendations.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, CEM could provide a faster, less expensive screening option that maintains cancer detection while increasing access to high‑risk surveillance.
How similar studies have gone: Observational studies and small comparative series suggest CEM can detect cancers at rates similar to MRI in some settings, but randomized evidence in high‑risk screening populations is limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Women at high risk of developing breast cancer already in care at participating centers or new referral for early diagnosis programs, aged between 35 and 60 years, with an estimated risk of breast cancer in the next 5 years \>=5%. To estimate the 5-year risk, centers may use one of the following models and criteria: * Tyrer Cuzick IBIS: criterion \>10% at 10 years; * BOADICEA: criterion \>10% at 10 years; * BCSC: criterion \>10% at 10 years (if possible switch to Tyrer-Cuzick if \>=2 relatives with breast or ovarian cancer); * MyPeBS (Mammorisk): woman included at very high risk in the MyPeBS study and who has completed the active follow-up period; * Women with previous chest irradiation for radiotherapy Exclusion Criteria: * \- Previous breast cancer; * Pregnancy; * Bilateral mastectomy; * Psychiatric or other disorders not compatible with compliance with the protocol and follow-up requirements; * Women who do not intend or cannot be followed for at least 2.5 years; * Women are unable to understand the information or to express a truly informed consent or non-consent to participation.
Where it's running
-
Istituto in tecnologie avanzate e modelli assistenziali in oncologia - AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia
Reggio Emilia, Italy/Reggio Emilia, Italy Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Paolo Giorgi Rossi, PhD, Specialization
- Email: paolo.giorgirossi@ausl.re.it
- Phone: +39335499770
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
How breast density affects mammogram screening and follow-up
This project will test whether women aged 45–75 with dense breasts have more recalls and additional diagnostic tests after routine mammograms than women with less dense breasts.
-
Single radiologist with AI support versus two radiologists for screening mammograms
This trial will see if one radiologist aided by AI can match the performance of the usual two-radiologist reading for screening mammograms in women aged 45–69.
-
National Mammography Database for Breast Screening
This program collects mammogram data from breast imaging centers to give them semi-annual feedback comparing their cancer detection, recall, and positive predictive values to national benchmarks.
-
AI-enhanced breast imaging for population screening
This project will test whether combining AI-assisted breast ultrasound and AI-assisted mammography improves detection accuracy and efficiency for women aged 35–69 in population-based breast cancer screening.
-
Bundled breast and colorectal screening plus genetic navigation
This program will test whether offering combined navigation for both breast and colorectal cancer screening, with genetic services when needed, helps Black and Hispanic women aged 45–74 complete recommended tests better than breast-only navigation.
-
Comparing the MAMMOMAT B.brilliant and Revelation mammography systems
We will try two FDA‑approved mammogram machines to see which shows suspicious breast calcifications more clearly in women having diagnostic mammography.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.