Comparing virtual ileostomy and diverting ileostomy for rectal cancer surgery
Official title: Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Virtual Ileostomy Versus Diverting Ileostomy in Patients Undergoing Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: a Multicentre, Prospective, Open-label, Blinded Endpoint, PROBE Study
Run by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University · NCT06633133 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether a new type of ileostomy can lower the need for stomas in patients having surgery for rectal cancer compared to the traditional method.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 620 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Chongqing) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 10, 2024 |
| Main results expected | December 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | October 1, 2030 |
| Registry record updated | October 16, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT06633133 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates include adults aged 18 and older diagnosed with rectal cancer who are undergoing specific surgical procedures like anterior resection or low anterior resection.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients requiring emergency surgery, those with severe comorbidities, or those with certain contraindications will not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to compare the safety and efficacy of virtual ileostomy versus diverting ileostomy in patients undergoing sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer. It is a national multicenter, randomized controlled study that will evaluate whether virtual ileostomy can effectively reduce stoma rates compared to traditional diverting ileostomy. Participants will undergo either procedure and will be followed for complications post-surgery. The study seeks to determine if virtual ileostomy is a viable alternative during total mesorectal excision.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a safer and more effective surgical option for patients with rectal cancer, potentially reducing the need for permanent stomas.
How similar studies have gone: While the concept of virtual ileostomy is innovative, similar studies have not been widely conducted, making this approach relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of rectal cancer confirmed by pathology * Age ≥ 18 years * Total mesorectal excision (TME) surgical procedures and colon-rectum or colon-anal anastomosis:1.anterior resection (AR/ PME), 2. low anterior resection (LAR) , 3.intersphincteric abdominoperineal resection (ISR), 4.transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) * Signed informed consent * Ability to understand the nature and risks of participating in the trial Exclusion Criteria: * Emergency surgery, open surgery * ASA score \>3points * Patients with combined complete intestinal obstruction * Long-term history of using immunosuppressants or glucocorticoids * Combined severe cardiac disease: with congestive heart failure or NYHA cardiac function ≥ grade 2. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction or coronary artery surgery within 6 months before the procedure * Chronic renal failure (requiring dialysis or glomerular filtration rate \<30 mL/min) * Intraoperative combined multi-organ resection * Combined cirrhosis of the liver * Intraoperative findings of incomplete anastomosis and positive insufflation test * Modified Bacon procedure(Two-Stage Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Coloanal Anastomosis) * Due to an intraoperative accident the surgeon felt that a diverting ileostomy was necessary. * Currently participating in other clinical trials
Where it's running
-
Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University
Chongqing, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: fan li, PhD
- Email: levinecq@163.com
- Phone: 18696539200
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Single vs. double stapling and purse-string techniques after rectal cancer surgery
This trial tests whether using a single-stapling method to join the bowel after rectal cancer surgery results in fewer leaks compared with the double-stapling method.
-
DEM301 in advanced colorectal cancer: a first-in-human test
This first-in-human Phase 1 study tests DEM301 in adults with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer to see if it is safe, how it behaves in the body, and whether it shows any signs of activity.
-
Rectal cancer registry to track real-world treatments and outcomes
This registry collects real-world data on how locally advanced rectal cancer is treated in Austria, to see how TNT and dMMR/MSI-H cases are managed and what outcomes occur.
-
Aerobic exercise and guided imagery for bowel problems after rectal cancer surgery
This study tests whether a program of aerobic exercise plus guided imagery helps people with low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery.
-
Active surveillance vs chemoradiotherapy after local removal of intermediate-risk T1 rectal cancer
This study tests whether close follow-up alone after local removal of early rectal cancer can match the cancer control of adding chemoradiotherapy, while reducing treatment-related side effects.
-
Different-Dose Short-Course Radiotherapy With CAPOX, PD-1 Blockade, and IL-2 in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
This phase II trial tests whether a low-dose short-course radiotherapy combined with CAPOX, a PD-1 blocker, and IL-2 works as well as the standard-dose short-course approach in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.