Comparing video laryngoscope plus video stylet versus video laryngoscope plus fibreoptic intubation for simulated difficult airways
Official title: Comparative Study Between Combined Video Laryngoscope and Video Stylet Intubation Versus Combined Video Laryngoscope and Fiberoptic Intubation
Run by National University of Malaysia · NCT07470736 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This test checks whether adding a video stylet or a fibreoptic bronchoscope to a video laryngoscope helps anesthesiology doctors with at least two years' experience intubate simulated difficult airways more quickly and reliably.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 75 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | National University of Malaysia Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Kuala Lumpur, Bandar Tun Razak) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 26, 2026 |
| Main results expected | September 14, 2027 |
| Study ends | March 14, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | March 17, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07470736 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal participants are anesthesiology medical officers with more than two years of airway experience who can attend sessions at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia and do not have severe hand tremors.
✕Probably not a fit
Clinicians with less than two years' experience, those with severe hand tremors, or those unable to attend the single-center sessions are unlikely to benefit from participating.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized, single-center crossover simulation compares three intubation techniques: video laryngoscope (VL) alone, VL plus video stylet (VS), and VL plus fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB). Participating anesthesiology medical officers with over two years' experience will perform each technique on a simulated difficult airway in randomized order, with a five-minute washout between attempts. The VL-only approach serves as the control standard, and sequence allocation is computer-randomized with equal proportions. Collected measures will include procedural success, time to intubation, and technical difficulties to inform practical airway management choices.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the results could help clinicians choose a combination technique that speeds up intubation and reduces airway complications in difficult cases.
How similar studies have gone: Both VL+VS and VL+FOB techniques have been studied separately with promising results for difficult airways, but direct head-to-head comparisons of these combined approaches in simulated difficult scenarios are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * the anaesthesiology medical officers who have at least more than two years of experience. Exclusion Criteria: * Thsoe who has severe hand tremors.
Where it's running
-
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Kuala Lumpur, Bandar Tun Razak, Malaysia Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Mohammad Nizam Mokhtar, MBChB
- Email: drnizam@ukm.edu.my
- Phone: +6091455555
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Recall and Perceived Usefulness of Ganzouri vs LEMON for Airway Checks
We’re testing whether anesthesia residents recall and feel Ganzouri’s airway scoring or LEMON is more applicable for predicting difficult airways.
-
High-flow nasal oxygen versus regular oxygen during awake intubation for difficult airways
This trial will test whether high-flow nasal oxygen helps adults with anticipated difficult airways keep their oxygen levels safer during awake tracheal intubation compared with conventional low-flow oxygen.
-
Comparing two videolaryngoscopes for placing breathing tubes in infants
This trial will test whether the BESDATA BD-DF videolaryngoscope works as well as the McGRATH MAC for placing breathing tubes on the first try in infants aged 6 months to 3 years during elective surgery.
-
How often difficult airways occur during heart surgery and creating a tool to predict them
This project will try to measure how often adults having cardiovascular surgery experience difficult airways and build a prediction model to spot those at higher risk.
-
Comparing awake tracheal intubation through the mouth versus the nose.
This study will test whether awake tracheal intubation through the mouth or the nose causes less discomfort for adults who need flexible bronchoscopy-guided intubation for a difficult airway.
-
Comparing two laryngoscopes for double lumen tube insertion during thoracic surgery
This study is testing which laryngoscope works better for inserting a special breathing tube in patients having chest surgery.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.