Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional

Comparing video laryngoscope plus video stylet versus video laryngoscope plus fibreoptic intubation for simulated difficult airways

Official title: Comparative Study Between Combined Video Laryngoscope and Video Stylet Intubation Versus Combined Video Laryngoscope and Fiberoptic Intubation

Run by National University of Malaysia · NCT07470736 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This test checks whether adding a video stylet or a fibreoptic bronchoscope to a video laryngoscope helps anesthesiology doctors with at least two years' experience intubate simulated difficult airways more quickly and reliably.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
SexAll
Enrollment75 (estimated)
SponsorNational University of Malaysia
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Kuala Lumpur, Bandar Tun Razak)
StatusRecruiting
StartedFebruary 26, 2026
Main results expectedSeptember 14, 2027
Study endsMarch 14, 2028
Registry record updatedMarch 17, 2026
Trial IDNCT07470736 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal participants are anesthesiology medical officers with more than two years of airway experience who can attend sessions at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia and do not have severe hand tremors.

Probably not a fit

Clinicians with less than two years' experience, those with severe hand tremors, or those unable to attend the single-center sessions are unlikely to benefit from participating.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This randomized, single-center crossover simulation compares three intubation techniques: video laryngoscope (VL) alone, VL plus video stylet (VS), and VL plus fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB). Participating anesthesiology medical officers with over two years' experience will perform each technique on a simulated difficult airway in randomized order, with a five-minute washout between attempts. The VL-only approach serves as the control standard, and sequence allocation is computer-randomized with equal proportions. Collected measures will include procedural success, time to intubation, and technical difficulties to inform practical airway management choices.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the results could help clinicians choose a combination technique that speeds up intubation and reduces airway complications in difficult cases.

How similar studies have gone: Both VL+VS and VL+FOB techniques have been studied separately with promising results for difficult airways, but direct head-to-head comparisons of these combined approaches in simulated difficult scenarios are limited.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* the anaesthesiology medical officers who have at least more than two years of experience.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Thsoe who has severe hand tremors.

Where it's running

  • Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
    Kuala Lumpur, Bandar Tun Razak, Malaysia
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.