Comparing two types of splints for wrist stiffness after a fracture
Official title: A Two-Arm, Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Static Progressive Splinting Versus Dynamic Splinting for Improving Wrist PROM/AROM in Patients With Persistent Post-DRF Stiffness
Run by Al Hayah University In Cairo · NCT06913933 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing which type of splint, static progressive or dynamic, helps adults with wrist stiffness after a fracture feel better and move their wrist more easily.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 50 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Al Hayah University In Cairo Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Cairo) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 17, 2025 |
| Main results expected | April 17, 2026 |
| Study ends | April 17, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | April 6, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06913933 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 years or older who have persistent wrist stiffness following a distal radius fracture and have completed standard rehabilitation.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with complex regional pain syndrome, significant wrist pathology unrelated to the fracture, or uncontrolled medical conditions may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial compares the effectiveness of static progressive splinting and dynamic splinting in treating persistent wrist stiffness in adults who are at least 8 weeks post distal radius fracture. Participants will receive one weekly supervised therapy session alongside their assigned splinting method over a 6-week period. The study aims to measure improvements in wrist range of motion and patient-reported outcomes, including satisfaction and function. Both splinting techniques will be evaluated to determine which is more effective in alleviating stiffness.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide patients with a more effective treatment option for improving wrist mobility and function after a distal radius fracture.
How similar studies have gone: While there is limited information on the success of similar studies, the comparison of splinting techniques for wrist stiffness is a relevant area of investigation that may yield valuable insights.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adults aged 18 years or older. At least 8 weeks post distal radius fracture (operative or nonoperative) who have completed standard rehabilitation. Demonstrated persistent wrist stiffness with ≤50% of contralateral wrist extension or flexion. Capable of providing written informed consent and complying with study procedures Exclusion Criteria: Presence of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) or active fracture healing issues. History of significant wrist pathology unrelated to the DRF. Uncontrolled medical conditions that would interfere with splint application or therapy. Known skin conditions or allergies that preclude orthosis use. Inability or unwillingness to adhere to the intervention protocol or follow-up schedule. Pregnant or breastfeeding individuals.
Where it's running
-
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Al Hayah University
Cairo, Egypt Recruiting
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Cannulated screws versus K-wires for fixing distal radius (wrist) fractures
This study will test whether cannulated screws or K-wires lead to better arm function and fewer complications in adults (18–60) with displaced extra-articular distal radius fractures.
-
Fu's subcutaneous needling with rehabilitation to help heal distal radius fractures after closed reduction
This trial will test whether adding Fu's subcutaneous needling to standard rehabilitation helps adults (18–85) heal distal radius fractures after closed reduction and splinting.
-
Using mechanical devices to manage pain and swelling after wrist surgery
This study is testing whether using special machines to help with pain and swelling can improve recovery for people who have had wrist surgery for a broken bone.
-
Comparing rehabilitation methods for wrist fractures in younger adults
This study is testing three different rehab methods for wrist fractures in younger adults to see which one helps them recover better.
-
Evaluating radiological criteria for stability in wrist fractures
This study tests if certain X-ray and CT scan results can help doctors decide if adults with wrist fractures need surgery after a closed reduction.
-
Long-term safety evaluation of NVDX3 treatment
This study is testing the long-term safety of the NVDX3 treatment in patients who have already received it, by checking in with them every year for 10 years to see if they experience any problems.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.