Comparing two types of membranes for bone regeneration in dental procedures
Official title: A Randomized Clinical Study Comparing the Bioresorbable Magnesium NOVAMag® Membrane With the Collagen Jason® Membrane in Patients Requiring Guided Bone Regeneration
Run by Botiss Medical AG · NCT06059898 · Data updated 2026-05-14
This study is no longer in our active list. It may have stopped recruiting or finished. The details below are as of 2026-05-14 and are kept for reference. Check ClinicalTrials.gov for its current status, or see similar studies below.
This study is testing whether a new biodegradable metal membrane can help people getting dental implants grow bone just as well as a traditional collagen membrane.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 84 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Botiss Medical AG Academic / other |
| Locations | 5 sites (Graz and 4 other locations) |
| Trial ID | NCT06059898 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults over 18 years old requiring multiple dental implants and having a healed site that necessitates GBR.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with major systemic diseases or those who have not healed sufficiently from previous dental extractions may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of the NOVAMag® membrane, a biodegradable metal membrane, against the Jason® collagen membrane in patients undergoing guided bone regeneration (GBR) for dental implants. The study aims to demonstrate that the NOVAMag® membrane is non-inferior to the collagen membrane in terms of bone volume gain as measured radiographically. GBR is a surgical technique that uses barrier membranes to promote bone healing and prevent soft tissue ingrowth, and this trial will assess the performance of these two different membrane types in achieving successful bone regeneration. Participants will undergo GBR surgery with the placement of the assigned membrane and subsequent analysis of bone healing.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a more effective and reliable option for bone regeneration in dental implant procedures.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown promising results with similar GBR techniques, but the specific use of the NOVAMag® membrane is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Obtained informed consent from the patient, patients voluntarily signing the informed consent form before study related actions including patient's acceptance of the scheduled program of clinical and radiographic analysis 2. The patient shall be at least 18 years of age, male or female and have passed cessation of growth 3. Patients asking for more than one dental implant and presenting one site with a healed site (class h1i, h2i; h3i, v1i, c1i, h1e, h2e, h3e, Cologne Classification of Alveolar Ridge Defects (CCARD) requiring a GBR procedure prior to implant placement. 4. The teeth at the implant site must have been extracted or lost at least 8 weeks before the date of bone augmentation (volumetrically healed site) Exclusion Criteria: Systemic exclusion criteria 1. Major systemic diseases (e.g. recent myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident or valvular prosthesis surgery, a poorly stabilized diabetes mellitus, severe hypertension, severe peripheral artery occlusive disease, malignancies, autoimmune diseases, or kidney diseases, untreated or uncontrolled periodontal disease, uncontrolled drug or alcohol abuse, uncontrolled psychiatric disorders) 2. Acute infectious diseases 3. Immunocompromised patients 4. Serious disturbances of bone metabolism and/or serious bone diseases of endocrine etiology 5. Due to judgement of the principal investigator: Medical conditions requiring prolonged use of steroids and/or on-going treatment with gluco- and mineralocorticoids and with agents affecting calcium metabolism (e.g. calcitonin), and/or anti-coagulative therapy 6. Previous or current use of antiresorptive medication (e.g. bisphosphonates) 7. Previous oral / maxillofacial radiotherapy 8. Heavy smoker (definition: \>10 cigarettes per day) 9. Currently pregnant or breastfeeding women 10. Health conditions, which do not permit the surgical treatment Local exclusion criteria 1. Acute local inflammation or untreated periodontitis 2. Insufficient oral hygiene 3. Regenerative periodontal treatment necessary adjacent to the planned study site of interest 4. Mucosal diseases or oral white or ulcerative lesions (e.g. lichen planus, leukoplakia) 5. History of head and neck irradiation therapy 6. Severe bruxism or clenching or other destructive habits 7. Previous socket preservation, GBR or guided tissue regeneration (GTR) treatment at the implant site 8. Infections in tissue and adjacent tissue of the planned implantation site 9. Known hypersensitivity to any of the trace elements 10. Edentulous cases
Where it's running
-
Medical University of Graz Department of Dental Medicine and Oral Health
Graz, Austria Recruiting -
University of Vienna, Department of Oral Surgery
Vienna, Austria Recruiting -
Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Copenhagen, Denmark Recruiting -
Studio medico odontoiatrico Papi Stp Srl
Roma, Italy Recruiting -
Studio Tabanella
Roma, Italy Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Werner Zechner, Prof. DDr. — University of Vienna, Department of Oral Surgery, Austria
- Study coordinator: Stefan Gesing, Dr.
- Email: Stefan.Gesing@Convidia.de
- Phone: +492512140131
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
One-stage ridge splitting in the back lower jaw using two techniques
This compares two surgical methods—piezo surgery versus conventional bone-disc cuts—to widen the narrow back lower jaw so dental implants can be placed in adults with limited ridge width.
-
One-stage ridge splitting in the upper jaw using piezo surgery or a bone-disc technique
We will try two ridge-splitting techniques—piezo surgery and bone discs—to widen narrow upper-jaw bone in adults needing a single-tooth implant.
-
Reconstruction of deficient atrophic ridges using a guide bone regeneration technique
This study tests which type of membrane, either a synthetic or natural one, helps people with bone loss in their jaw grow more bone after surgery.
-
Comparing timing of gum grafts and bone regeneration for dental implants
This study is testing whether doing gum surgery before or after bone treatment helps dental implants heal better and have fewer problems.
-
Comparing two bone grafts to preserve the socket after tooth extraction
This test will compare an allograft and a bovine xenograft to see which better preserves jaw bone and gum shape after tooth extraction in healthy adults aged 21–50.
-
Using PeptiCol EZgraft for preserving tooth extraction sockets
This study tests whether a new collagen treatment called PeptiCol EZgraft can better preserve tooth extraction sites compared to a standard treatment called Regenomer.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.