Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 and up Women only

Comparing two types of laparoscopic surgery for urinary incontinence

Official title: Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension Versus Modified Burch Colposuspension For Treatment Of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence; Randomized Controlled Trial

Run by Al-Azhar University · NCT05616481 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing which of two types of laparoscopic surgery works better and has fewer complications for women with stress urinary incontinence who haven't found relief from other treatments.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexWomen only
Enrollment120 (estimated)
SponsorAl-Azhar University
Academic / other
Drugs / interventionsradiation
Locations1 site (Cairo, Cairo Governorate)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJanuary 1, 2022
Main results expectedJune 2025
Study endsJuly 2025
Registry record updatedMay 29, 2025
Trial IDNCT05616481 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates for this study are women with genuine stress urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence with a predominant stress element who have not found relief through conservative therapies.

Probably not a fit

Patients with predominant urge urinary incontinence or those who have had recent pelvic surgery or previous surgeries for stress urinary incontinence may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This study compares the success rates and complications of two surgical techniques for treating stress urinary incontinence: standard laparoscopic Burch colposuspension and a modified version that resembles the transobturator tape method. The goal is to determine which approach offers better outcomes for women suffering from this condition. Participants will be women with genuine stress urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence with a predominant stress component who have not responded to conservative treatments. The study will evaluate both the effectiveness and safety of these surgical interventions.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved surgical options for women suffering from stress urinary incontinence.

How similar studies have gone: Other studies have explored various surgical techniques for urinary incontinence, but this specific comparison of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension methods is relatively novel.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Women with genuine stress urinary incontinence.
* Mixed urinary incontinence with predominant stress element.
* Refractory cases to conservative therapy or patients who are not willing to consider (further) conservative treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Mixed incontinence with predominant Urge urinary incontinence.
* Recent pelvic surgery (less than 3 months).
* Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.
* Previous surgery for stress urinary incontinence.
* Pregnancy
* Less than 12 months post-partum.
* Other gynaecologic pathologies affecting bladder functions ( eg, fibroids, ovarian cysts)
* Genito-urinary malignancy.
* Current chemo or radiation therapy.

Where it's running

  • Mohamed Fawzy Salman
    Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.