Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional

Comparing two types of catheters for removing bile duct stones

Official title: Randomized Trial of the Removal Ability With Vortic Catch V Basket Catheter Versus Ordinary Basket Catheter for Bile Duct Stones

Run by Showa Inan General Hospital · NCT05363345 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether a new type of catheter can remove larger bile duct stones better than the standard catheter for patients with these stones.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
SexAll
Enrollment100 (estimated)
SponsorShowa Inan General Hospital
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Komagane, Nagano)
StatusRecruiting
StartedFebruary 2, 2022
Main results expectedDecember 31, 2026
Study endsDecember 31, 2026
Registry record updatedAugust 11, 2026
Trial IDNCT05363345 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates for this study are patients with suspected or known common bile duct stones that are 10 mm or larger and who have undergone endoscopic papillary balloon dilation.

Probably not a fit

Patients experiencing septic shock, coagulopathy, or suspected malignancy may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of the Vortic Catch V basket catheter against a standard ordinary basket catheter in removing bile duct stones that are 10 mm or larger. Patients suspected of having or confirmed to have common bile duct stones will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two catheter types during the procedure. The study will evaluate the success rate of stone removal using these two different catheters, providing insights into which method may be more effective for patients.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved techniques for the removal of bile duct stones, enhancing patient outcomes and reducing complications.

How similar studies have gone: While there may be existing studies on catheter effectiveness, this specific comparison of the Vortic Catch V basket catheter versus ordinary basket catheter is novel.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* patients with suspected of having, or known to have, common bile duct stones (≧ 10 mm)
* endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPLBD) was performed.

Exclusion Criteria:

* septic shock
* coagulopathy (international normalized ratio 1.3, partial thromboplastin time greater than twice that of control),
* \<platelet count 50,000 / L
* suspected or confirmed malignancy

Where it's running

  • Showa Inan General hospital
    Komagane, Nagano, Japan
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.