Comparing two types of bone grafts for tooth replacement
Official title: Clinical Evaluation of Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft Compared to Collagen-Enriched Bovine Xenograft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation of Anterior Extraction Sockets.
Run by University of Rochester · NCT06722482 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing which of two types of bone grafts helps people keep their jawbone healthy after losing a front tooth before getting a dental implant.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 50 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Rochester Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Rochester, New York) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 27, 2023 |
| Main results expected | November 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | November 1, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | January 9, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06722482 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 and older who require extraction of an anterior tooth and seek dental implant replacement.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who smoke, have uncontrolled diabetes, or are on certain medications may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study compares two bone graft materials, freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) and collagen-enriched bovine xenograft (CEBX), used for preserving bone after the extraction of an anterior tooth before dental implant placement. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either FDBA or CEBX, and the study will evaluate differences in ridge dimensional changes, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction over a 16-week healing period. The study includes multiple visits and utilizes advanced imaging techniques to assess the effectiveness of each graft material.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve the outcomes of dental implant procedures by identifying the more effective bone graft material.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown varying success with different bone graft materials, making this a relevant comparison in the field.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * patients able to provide informed consent * patients of 18 years of age or older at time of consent and enrollment * patients in need of at least one anterior tooth extraction and seeking dental implant replacement * bone on the buccal of the central/lateral incisors or canines planned for extraction that is either intact or has a dehiscence \</=5mm as determined radiographically through cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) Exclusion Criteria: * current smokers or tobacco-product users (self-reported) * uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c≥7 in the last 3 months) * pregnant and/or lactating females (self-reported) * patients on immunosuppressants, steroids, bisphosphonates or other medications that have been related to Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) as described by the American Association of Oral Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) 2014 update * patients with history of radiation of the head and neck * patients with allergy to collagen, bacitracin and/or polymyxin B * patients with religious or cultural beliefs that prohibit the use of either allograft or bovine graft material * patients with physical and/or mental/cognitive disabilities (self-reported) or decisionally-impaired, not able to consent for themselves * patients with untreated periodontitis * patients with central/lateral incisors or canines requiring extraction and are adjacent to an edentulous area * patients with central/lateral incisors or canines with buccal bone dehiscence \>5mm
Where it's running
-
Eastman Institute for Oral Health
Rochester, New York, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Elli Anna Kotsailidi, DDS, MS — Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester
- Study coordinator: Elli Anna Kotsailidi, DDS, MS
- Email: elli_kotsailidi@urmc.rochester.edu
- Phone: 585-274-1146
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Lateral sinus lift with Xenograft alone vs L-PRF block plus Xenograft
This study tests whether adding an L-PRF block to a Xenograft-assisted lateral sinus lift improves bone formation for dental implants in adults with limited upper jaw bone height.
-
Two-photon microscopy on skin biopsies to help diagnose skin lesions
This study tests whether images from two-photon fluorescence microscopy of dermatology biopsies can match the diagnosis determined by standard histology.
-
Machine learning assessment of two-photon microscopy images from skin biopsies
A machine learning model is tested on two-photon microscopy images of skin biopsy samples taken in clinic to see if it can correctly predict basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or non-cancer compared with standard histology.
-
Impact of Targeted Therapy on Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment
This study checks whether brain health and well‑being differ for people with leukemia who are starting or on TKI therapy compared with similar individuals without cancer or TKI exposure.
-
Personalized cardiac imaging approach for women with early breast cancer on HER2 therapy
This study tests a personalized, risk-based plan to reduce unnecessary heart imaging while still catching heart problems early in women with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving HER2-targeted therapy.
-
Remote Assessments and Genetic Factors in Congenital and Childhood DM1
This study tests how congenital, childhood, and juvenile DM1 affect kids by doing remote visits, activities, and a small blood sample to explore symptoms and genetics.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.