Clinical trial Recruiting at 7 sites Interventional Ages 21 and up Women only

Comparing two treatments for stress urinary incontinence in women

Official title: A Randomized Trial of Transurethral Bulking Agent Injection Versus Single-Incision Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence

Run by NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network · NCT06480227 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing which treatment, a special gel injection or a small surgical sling, works better for women dealing with stress urinary incontinence.

More Urinary Incontinence trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages21 Years and up
SexWomen only
Enrollment358 (estimated)
SponsorNICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Research network
Drugs / interventionsradiation
Locations7 sites (La Jolla, California and 6 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedAugust 28, 2024
Main results expectedDecember 31, 2028
Study endsDecember 31, 2030
Registry record updatedJune 8, 2026
Trial IDNCT06480227 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are women aged 21 and older who have bothersome stress urinary incontinence or stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence that has not improved with conservative management.

Probably not a fit

Patients with advanced vaginal prolapse or those with urge-predominant mixed urinary incontinence may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This multicentered, double-blind, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of a transurethral bulking agent (TBA) and a single-incision sling (SIS) in treating women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). A total of 358 women will be randomly assigned to receive either treatment, with their outcomes assessed at multiple follow-up points over three years. The primary outcome will be measured by patient-reported improvement in symptoms at 12 months, while secondary outcomes will include retreatment rates, objective measures of improvement, and quality of life assessments. Both interventions are FDA-approved and will be administered according to their approved uses.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide women with more effective treatment options for stress urinary incontinence.

How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown success with similar surgical interventions for urinary incontinence, indicating that this approach is well-tested.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Women ≥ 21 years
* For \> 3 months, bothersome SUI (response of somewhat, moderately, or quite a bit) without UUI or stress-predominant MUI. For those with equal bother of UUI and SUI, clinician determination that SUI is more severe/significant than UUI is required.
* A positive cough stress test on standardized non-invasive testing or urodynamic SUI within the past 18 months.
* Normal PVR \< 150 mL
* Candidate for either study procedure as determined by treating surgeon
* Available for up to 3 years.
* Agrees to randomization.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Anterior/apical vaginal prolapse beyond the hymen (\>0 on POPQ)
* Urge-predominant mixed UI despite stable therapy
* Advanced UUI/OAB 3rd line therapy treatment within 1 year of enrollment.
* Planned hysterectomy, urethral or anterior/apical surgeries s requiring general anesthesia at the time of SUI treatment, during the last 6 months, or planned within the next 12 months.
* Malignancy or history of radiation of the pelvis
* Pregnant, post-partum, breast feeding or plans for pregnancy within 1 year
* Incomplete emptying (PVR \> 150mL)
* Prior anti-incontinence procedure
* Neurogenic bladder
* Unwilling to continue current UUI treatment until completion of primary outcome at 12 months
* Prior adverse reaction to synthetic mesh or urethral bulking material
* Chronic bladder or pelvic pain conditions (e.g., Interstitial cystitis, painful bladder syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic pelvic pain, etc.)
* Active treatment for SUI with a pessary. For those using a pessary or other SUI support device, a 3-week washout period should occur prior to assessing baseline measures.

Where it's running

  • University of California at San Diego
    La Jolla, California, United States
    Recruiting
  • Kaiser Permanente -- San Diego
    San Diego, California, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois, United States
    Recruiting
  • Duke University, Duke Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery
    Durham, North Carolina, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
    Recruiting
  • Brown/ Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery
    Providence, Rhode Island, United States
    Recruiting
Show 1 more location
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas, United States
    Recruiting

Study contacts

  • Principal investigator: Emily Lukacz, MD — University of California, San Diego

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.