Comparing two treatments for stress urinary incontinence in women
Official title: A Randomized Trial of Transurethral Bulking Agent Injection Versus Single-Incision Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence
Run by NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network · NCT06480227 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing which treatment, a special gel injection or a small surgical sling, works better for women dealing with stress urinary incontinence.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 21 Years and up |
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 358 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Research network |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 7 sites (La Jolla, California and 6 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 28, 2024 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2028 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2030 |
| Registry record updated | June 8, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06480227 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are women aged 21 and older who have bothersome stress urinary incontinence or stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence that has not improved with conservative management.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with advanced vaginal prolapse or those with urge-predominant mixed urinary incontinence may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This multicentered, double-blind, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of a transurethral bulking agent (TBA) and a single-incision sling (SIS) in treating women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). A total of 358 women will be randomly assigned to receive either treatment, with their outcomes assessed at multiple follow-up points over three years. The primary outcome will be measured by patient-reported improvement in symptoms at 12 months, while secondary outcomes will include retreatment rates, objective measures of improvement, and quality of life assessments. Both interventions are FDA-approved and will be administered according to their approved uses.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide women with more effective treatment options for stress urinary incontinence.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown success with similar surgical interventions for urinary incontinence, indicating that this approach is well-tested.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Women ≥ 21 years * For \> 3 months, bothersome SUI (response of somewhat, moderately, or quite a bit) without UUI or stress-predominant MUI. For those with equal bother of UUI and SUI, clinician determination that SUI is more severe/significant than UUI is required. * A positive cough stress test on standardized non-invasive testing or urodynamic SUI within the past 18 months. * Normal PVR \< 150 mL * Candidate for either study procedure as determined by treating surgeon * Available for up to 3 years. * Agrees to randomization. Exclusion Criteria: * Anterior/apical vaginal prolapse beyond the hymen (\>0 on POPQ) * Urge-predominant mixed UI despite stable therapy * Advanced UUI/OAB 3rd line therapy treatment within 1 year of enrollment. * Planned hysterectomy, urethral or anterior/apical surgeries s requiring general anesthesia at the time of SUI treatment, during the last 6 months, or planned within the next 12 months. * Malignancy or history of radiation of the pelvis * Pregnant, post-partum, breast feeding or plans for pregnancy within 1 year * Incomplete emptying (PVR \> 150mL) * Prior anti-incontinence procedure * Neurogenic bladder * Unwilling to continue current UUI treatment until completion of primary outcome at 12 months * Prior adverse reaction to synthetic mesh or urethral bulking material * Chronic bladder or pelvic pain conditions (e.g., Interstitial cystitis, painful bladder syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic pelvic pain, etc.) * Active treatment for SUI with a pessary. For those using a pessary or other SUI support device, a 3-week washout period should occur prior to assessing baseline measures.
Where it's running
-
University of California at San Diego
La Jolla, California, United States Recruiting -
Kaiser Permanente -- San Diego
San Diego, California, United States Recruiting -
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States Recruiting -
Duke University, Duke Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery
Durham, North Carolina, United States Recruiting -
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States Recruiting -
Brown/ Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery
Providence, Rhode Island, United States Recruiting
Show 1 more location
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Emily Lukacz, MD — University of California, San Diego
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Compare two pelvic floor stimulation devices to see which helps with urinary incontinence in women
We’re testing if electromagnetic chair therapy can help women with mixed urinary incontinence as well as standard electrostimulation with biofeedback.
-
Prophylactic antibiotics to reduce post-procedure UTIs after urethral bulking
We’re testing whether giving a preventive antibiotic at the time of urethral bulking can lower the chance of a urinary tract infection after the procedure for women with stress or mixed urinary incontinence.
-
See if increasing running cadence helps stress urinary incontinence in parous runners
This study tests whether increasing running cadence by about 10% for eight weeks can reduce stress urinary incontinence symptoms in parous women who run regularly and own a Garmin watch.
-
Urinary incontinence in older adults: how leakage and bladder residuals relate to frailty
This study tests whether the severity of urinary leakage and leftover urine after voiding are linked to frailty and other geriatric outcomes in older adults visiting a urology clinic.
-
Educational video before urodynamic testing to see if it lowers anxiety
This study tests whether watching a short educational video before urodynamics helps reduce anxiety for women undergoing the test.
-
Improving Uroflowmetry: Do Pre-Procedure Reminders Help Women Undergoing Urodynamics
This study tests whether sending reminder calls before a urodynamics test helps women with pelvic floor disorders feel more prepared and less anxious, and whether it makes the procedure go more smoothly.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.