Comparing two techniques for treating neck pain with radiofrequency neurotomy
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Trial Comparing End-on Versus Parallel Radiofrequency Lesioning for Neurotomy of the Cervical Medial Branch Nerves: The EndPaRL Study
Run by University Health Network, Toronto · NCT05818774 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing two different methods of using radiofrequency treatment to see which one helps adults with chronic neck pain from arthritis feel better.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 85 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 72 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University Health Network, Toronto Academic / other |
| Locations | 3 sites (Toronto, Ontario and 2 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 10, 2023 |
| Main results expected | December 2027 |
| Study ends | March 2028 |
| Registry record updated | January 16, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT05818774 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18-85 with chronic neck pain due to cervical zygapophyseal joint arthritis who have not found relief from conservative treatments.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with chronic widespread pain or those who have previously undergone radiofrequency neurotomy of the cervical medial branch nerves may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study aims to compare the efficacy of two radiofrequency neurotomy techniques for treating chronic neck pain caused by cervical zygapophyseal joint arthritis. Participants will undergo either end-on or parallel lesioning of the cervical medial branch nerves using specialized needles. The study will include adults aged 18-85 who have experienced moderate to severe neck pain for at least three months and have not responded to conservative treatments. The effectiveness of these techniques will be evaluated based on patient-reported pain relief and functional improvement.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a more effective treatment option for patients suffering from chronic neck pain.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown promise with radiofrequency neurotomy techniques, indicating potential for success in this approach.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adult patient of either gender aged 18-85 years 2. Predominant axial (non-radicular) neck pain for at least 3 months 3. 7-day average NRS score for neck pain ≥ 5/10 at baseline evaluation 4. Moderate or greater functional impairment due to pain, defined as NDI Questionnaire raw score of 15 out of 50 (≥30% )e Failure to respond to conservative medical management (pharmacologic, physical therapy) for at least 3 months; f) Positive response to two consecutive diagnostic blocks of the CMBN with a short and long-acting anesthetic Exclusion Criteria: 1. Participants with financial incentives or litigation associated with ongoing pain 2. Inability to complete assessment instruments 3. Chronic widespread pain 4. Prior RFN of the CMBN; 5. Severe mental health issues 6. Pregnancy or other reason that precludes the use of fluoroscopy 7. Untreated coagulopathy 8. Systemic or local infection at the time of screening.
Where it's running
-
Women's College Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada Recruiting -
University Health Network (UHN)
Toronto, Ontario, Canada Recruiting -
Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Reanimation, and Pain Medicine, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona.
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Anuj Bhatia, MD, PhD — Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, Toronto
- Study coordinator: Danielle Alvares, PhD
- Email: danielle.alvares@uhn.ca
- Phone: (416) 603-5800
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Upper extremity function in neck pain: comparing people with chronic neck pain to healthy individuals
We will test how chronic non-specific neck pain affects upper body function and quality of life by comparing people with neck pain to healthy adults.
-
Kinesiology Taping vs Self-Mobilization for Neck Pain from Prolonged Device Use
This study tests whether applying kinesiology tape or doing self-mobilization helps adults with neck pain who spend many hours on electronic devices.
-
Biofeedback and Mulligan neck therapy for mechanical neck pain in women
This study tests whether adding biofeedback-guided deep cervical flexor training to Mulligan mobilization and standard neck exercises helps reduce pain and improve movement in women aged 18–45 with mechanical neck pain.
-
Gelified radiopaque ethanol for cervical disc herniation in routine care
This observational study looks at how patients with cervical disc herniation and chronic neck pain fare after treatment with Absolute Gel, used in standard clinical practice.
-
Steroid Injections for Back and Neck Pain: What Works Best
This study tests different steroid injections and combinations to see what provides the best pain relief and function for adults with back or neck pain.
-
SCENAR therapy for chronic neck pain
This study tests whether repeating SCENAR therapy can reduce disability and pain for adults with long-standing non-specific neck pain.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.