Comparing two techniques for treating frozen shoulder
Official title: Comparative Effects Of Spencer and Reverse Distraction Technique In Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis
Run by Riphah International University · NCT06407817 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing two different treatment methods for frozen shoulder to see which one helps people feel better and move their arms more easily.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 40 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 50 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Riphah International University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 1, 2024 |
| Main results expected | January 2025 |
| Study ends | January 2025 |
| Registry record updated | December 27, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT06407817 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are individuals aged 40 to 60 with stage 2 or 3 adhesive capsulitis and specific limitations in shoulder range of motion.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with a history of shoulder surgery, fractures, neurological disorders, systemic arthritic conditions, or cervical spine disorders may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of the Spencer technique and the reverse distraction technique in patients suffering from adhesive capsulitis, commonly known as frozen shoulder. The study will involve 50 participants aged 40 to 60, who will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Over a period of four weeks, the participants' pain levels, range of motion, muscle strength, and overall quality of life will be assessed before and after the interventions. Data analysis will be conducted using SPSS software to determine the outcomes of each technique.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide patients with more effective treatment options for managing adhesive capsulitis.
How similar studies have gone: While there is limited information on the specific techniques being compared, similar studies on adhesive capsulitis treatments have shown varying degrees of success.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age group 40-60 years * Male and female * Positive Capsular pattern (ER more limited than Abd which is more limited than IR) * Limitation in shoulder ROM ; Flexion \<180 , Abduction \<180 , External Rotation \<50 * Patients of stage 2 and 3 of adhesive capsulitis Exclusion Criteria: * History of surgery of the affected shoulder * Fractures in around the shoulder * Neurological disorders leading to altered muscle activity * Systemic arthritic conditions (RA, Osteoporosis) * Disorders of the cervical spine
Where it's running
-
Johar Pain Relief Center
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Rabiya Noor, PHD — Riphah International University
- Study coordinator: Minal Mushtaq, MS-DPT
- Email: minalmustafakhan@gmail.com
- Phone: 03314662231
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Niel-Asher Technique vs Bowen Technique for Frozen Shoulder
This trial tests whether two manual therapy methods differ in reducing shoulder pain and improving motion for people with frozen shoulder aged 40–60.
-
Maitland mobilization with and without stroking release for frozen shoulder
This trial tests whether adding a stroking release technique to Maitland mobilization helps people aged 40–60 with stage 2–3 frozen shoulder improve shoulder movement and reduce pain.
-
Additional effects of thoracic mobilization versus manipulation with standard physical therapy in adhesive capsulitis
This study tests whether adding thoracic manipulation or thoracic mobilization to standard physical therapy helps people with adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder).
-
Spinal and Kaltenborn mobilization for a stiff shoulder (frozen shoulder)
A randomized trial tests spinal mobilization with arm movement and Kaltenborn mobilization to see if they reduce pain and improve motion and function in people with adhesive capsulitis.
-
Shoulder Frozen Shoulder: TAME vs Corticosteroid Injection
This study tests whether transcatheter arterial microembolization (TAME) works better than corticosteroid injections for people with frozen shoulder.
-
Gong's Mobilization With and Without Niel-Asher Technique for Frozen Shoulder
This trial tests whether Gong's mobilization alone or with the Niel-Asher trigger-point technique can ease pain, improve shoulder movement, and reduce disability in adults with adhesive capsulitis.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.