Comparing two techniques for improving trunk control and mobility in stroke patients
Official title: Effects of Stabilizing Reversal and Rhythmic Stabilization Versus Pelvic Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on Trunk Control, Postural Stability and Mobility in Stroke Patients
Run by Riphah International University · NCT06459388 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing two different rehabilitation methods to see which one helps stroke patients improve their trunk control and mobility better.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 40 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 50 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Riphah International University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 1, 2024 |
| Main results expected | January 2025 |
| Study ends | January 2025 |
| Registry record updated | December 27, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT06459388 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are individuals aged 40-65 who have been diagnosed with ischemic stroke within the last 6 months.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with recurrent strokes, significant musculoskeletal disorders, or severe spasticity may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to compare the effects of two rehabilitation techniques: stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization versus pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in patients who have suffered an ischemic stroke. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups and will undergo their respective interventions for 8 weeks, with assessments conducted at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks to evaluate trunk control, postural stability, and mobility. The study will utilize various assessment scales to measure outcomes and will analyze the data using appropriate statistical methods.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide insights into more effective rehabilitation techniques for improving mobility and stability in stroke patients.
How similar studies have gone: While similar rehabilitation approaches have been explored, this specific comparison of techniques is relatively novel and has not been extensively tested.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosed cases of ischemic stroke. * Both genders of stroke patients. * Age of stroke patients between 40-65 years. * Duration of stroke less than 6 months. * Participants should be able to understand and follow simple verbal commands (MMSE * 24). Exclusion Criteria: * Recurrent history of stroke. * Recent history of any trauma. * Musculoskeletal disorders such as low back pain, arthritis, degenerative diseases of the lower limbs affecting motor performance, spinal deformity and contractures. * Spasticity (modified Ashworth scale grade ≥3) or flaccidity in lower limbs and upper limbs. * PNF treatment given to the pelvic region within 6 weeks.
Where it's running
-
Lahore General Hospital
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Wajiha Shahid, Phd* — Riphah International University
- Study coordinator: Imran Amjad, Phd
- Email: imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk
- Phone: 03324390125
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Paired VNS: How the Brain and Pupils Respond in Stroke Patients
This study tests real-time physiologic responses to paired VNS in adults with chronic motor impairment after ischemic stroke to help tailor dosing.
-
NeuroAiD test in mild to moderate ischemic stroke patients
This study tests whether adding MLC901 (NeuroAiD II) to standard stroke care helps adults who recently had an ischemic stroke recover better than standard care alone.
-
Using IMPROVE to guide carotid revascularisation decisions
This trial tests whether using the IMPROVE MRI-based score to select patients for carotid revascularisation is as good as standard care based mainly on stenosis degree, among people who have had a recent stroke or TIA due to carotid disease.
-
High-intensity interval versus moderate continuous exercise for stroke-related muscle loss
This will test whether high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or moderate-intensity continuous training (MCIT) better helps people 1–6 months after an ischemic stroke who have muscle loss regain muscle mass, strength, walking ability, and quality of life.
-
Test of adding a very low-dose edoxaban to standard antiplatelet therapy to prevent another stroke in adults 75 and older
This trial tests whether adding a tiny amount of edoxaban to aspirin or clopidogrel can better prevent a second stroke in people aged 75+ who recently had an ischemic stroke.
-
HR-MRI–Directed Tirofiban Therapy for Late-Window ICAS-LAA Stroke
We’re testing whether tirofiban plus dual antiplatelet therapy, guided by high-resolution MRI of the brain’s blood vessels, can help people with intracranial large-artery atherosclerosis strokes that begin more than 24 hours after onset.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.