Comparing two suturing techniques for closing abdominal surgery wounds
Official title: The Comparison of Interrupted Modified Smead-Jones Versus Conventional Continuous Suturing Technique for Closure of Rectus Sheath in Patients Undergoing Laparotomy for Hollow Viscus Perforation.
Run by King Edward Medical University · NCT06697067 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether a new way of stitching up surgery wounds works better than the traditional method for patients having emergency surgery for a perforated organ.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 108 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | King Edward Medical University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 6, 2024 |
| Main results expected | June 6, 2025 |
| Study ends | June 21, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | November 20, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT06697067 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 to 60 who require emergency laparotomy for hollow viscus perforation.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with a history of previous laparotomy or those presenting with abdominal wall injuries may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of the interrupted modified Smead-Jones suturing technique against the conventional continuous suturing technique for closing the rectus sheath in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for hollow viscus perforation. A total of 108 patients aged 18 to 60 will be randomly assigned to one of the two suturing methods after undergoing necessary pre-operative assessments. The study will monitor outcomes related to wound dehiscence, a common complication that can lead to increased morbidity and prolonged hospital stays. The trial is conducted at King Edward Medical University and Mayo Hospital Lahore.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved surgical outcomes and reduced complications for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown varying success with different suturing techniques, but this specific comparison is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:All patients of both genders with age greater than 18 to 60 years, undergoing emergency laparotomy through midline incision for hollow viscus perforation. ASA grade III - Exclusion Criteria:Patients who had undergone a previous laparotomy for any condition or had an incisional hernia or burst abdomen at presentation. Patients undergoing laparotomy with anterior abdominal wall injury in the form of muscle, hematoma, disruption or abdominal wall laceration. \-
Where it's running
-
Department of Surgery, King Edward Medical University
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
SEPS vs Open Ligation for Varicose Veins in the Leg
This study tests whether subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) works better than open perforator ligation for adults with varicose veins in the leg.
-
Aspirin alone vs. low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin for chronic limb-threatening ischemia
This trial tests whether adding a low dose of rivaroxaban to aspirin helps people aged 40–70 with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and diabetes see fewer limb and heart-related problems.
-
Benzhexol vs. Procyclidine for tremor in tremor-predominant Parkinson's
This study tests whether benzhexol works as well as procyclidine to reduce tremor in adults with tremor-predominant Parkinson's disease who are taking levodopa.
-
Eslicarbazepine in adults with focal-onset seizures
This project tests how eslicarbazepine works in adults with focal-onset seizures in routine care, including those who are new to treatment and those switching from carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine.
-
N-acetylcysteine for non-acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure
Researchers are testing whether adding oral N-acetylcysteine to standard care helps adults with non-acetaminophen acute liver failure survive longer compared with standard care alone.
-
Modified DHAP vs Standard DHAP in relapsed/refractory DLBCL
This phase 3 trial tests whether a split, lower-dose version of DHAP is as effective as the standard regimen for adults with relapsed or refractory DLBCL and tries to reduce toxicities.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.