Comparing two surgical treatments for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Compared to Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt as Treatment for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (ENDOVEST): A Randomized Trial

Not applicable Interventional University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland · NCT06488248

This study is testing whether a new surgical option called endoscopic third ventriculostomy can help older adults with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus feel better, just like the traditional ventriculoperitoneal shunt, but with fewer risks.

Quick facts

PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional
Enrollment150 (estimated)
Ages40 Years and up
SexAll
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, Switzerland Academic / other
Locations1 site (Basel)
Trial IDNCT06488248 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What this trial studies

This clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of two surgical interventions, endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS), in treating idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). The study is a single-center, two-arm, open-labeled, randomized controlled trial that focuses on clinical improvement in patients suffering from iNPH. It targets elderly individuals who experience symptoms such as gait disturbances, cognitive decline, and urinary dysfunction. The goal is to determine whether ETV can provide similar symptom relief as VPS while reducing the risk of complications associated with shunt placement.

Who should consider this trial

Good fit: Ideal candidates for this study are individuals over 40 years old with symptoms of iNPH lasting between 3 to 24 months, including gait disturbances and cognitive impairment.

Not a fit: Patients with secondary causes of hydrocephalus, significant neurological conditions, or those unable to provide informed consent may not benefit from this study.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a safer surgical option for patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, potentially leading to fewer complications and improved quality of life.

How similar studies have performed: Previous studies have shown that ETV can be effective for certain types of hydrocephalus, but this specific comparison with VPS in iNPH is relatively novel.

Eligibility criteria

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* \>40 years of age
* Symptom duration ≥3 months, \<24 months
* No antecedent head trauma, ICH, meningitis, or other cause of secondary hydrocephalus
* MUST show gait/balance disturbance, PLUS cognition impairment AND/OR urinary dysfunction.
* Ventricular enlargement (Evans Index \> 0.3) not attributable to cerebral atrophy or congenital enlargement
* No macroscopic obstruction to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow Spinal Tap-Test
* Opening pressure (on lateral decubitus): \<24cmH2O
* Clinical improvement in at least one of the main symptoms after 40-50ml withdrawal of CSF

Exclusion Criteria:

* ≤40 years of age
* No informed consent
* Other neurologic, psychiatric or general medical condition which is sufficient to explain the presenting symptoms.
* Previous cranial neurosurgical interventions
* Other associated dementia syndromes
* Incapacity to walk
* Pregnancy and breastfeeding women

Where this trial is running

Basel

Study contacts

How to participate

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Conditions Idiopathic Normal Pressure HydrocephalusSurgical treatmentNeurosurgeryEndoscopic third ventriculostomyVentriculoperitoneal shunt
Last reviewed 2026-06-13 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.