Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 50 to 80 Men only

Comparing two surgical methods for treating enlarged prostate

Official title: Bipolar Trans Urethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) Versus Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate in Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): A Prospective Randomized Comparative Clinical Study

Run by South Valley University · NCT06983444 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing two different surgical methods for treating an enlarged prostate to see which one is safer and more effective for men with urinary problems.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages50 Years to 80 Years
SexMen only
Enrollment100 (estimated)
SponsorSouth Valley University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Qina, Qena Governorate)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJune 1, 2025
Main results expectedJune 30, 2026
Study endsJuly 2026
Registry record updatedMay 21, 2025
Trial IDNCT06983444 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are men aged 50-80 with lower urinary tract symptoms due to BPH and specific urinary flow rate and prostate volume criteria.

Probably not a fit

Patients with prostate or bladder cancer, urethral stricture, or neurogenic bladder may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of two surgical techniques for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and bipolar enucleation of the prostate (TUEP). TURP has been the traditional gold standard but carries significant risks and complications, while TUEP is a minimally invasive alternative that may offer similar effectiveness with fewer complications. The study aims to compare these two approaches to determine their true benefits and safety profiles. Patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to BPH will be enrolled based on specific eligibility criteria.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a safer and more effective surgical option for patients suffering from BPH.

How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown promising results for minimally invasive approaches like bipolar enucleation, indicating potential success for this comparison.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to BPH.
2. Patients with international prostate score system (IPSS) more than 8.
3. Patients with maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax) less than 10ml/second.
4. Patients with Prostatic volume (60 - 100 gm).
5. Patient with indication for surgical intervention.
6. Patient age (50-80 years old)

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Prostatic cancer.
2. Bladder cancer.
3. Urethral stricture.
4. Neurogenic bladder.

Where it's running

  • Faculty of Medicine South Valley University
    Qina, Qena Governorate, Egypt
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.