Comparing two pulsed-field ablation catheters for atrial fibrillation with left atrial appendage closure
Official title: Comparison of Different Pulsed Field Ablation Catheters Combined With Stroke Prevention in High Stroke Risk·Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by Hangzhou Dinova EP Technology Co., Ltd · NCT07036965 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This will try two different pulsed-field ablation catheters in people with symptomatic, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation who also need left atrial appendage closure to see which is safer and more effective.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 118 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 292 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Hangzhou Dinova EP Technology Co., Ltd Industry-sponsored |
| Locations | 1 site (Hangzhou) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 30, 2025 |
| Main results expected | July 30, 2027 |
| Study ends | June 30, 2031 |
| Registry record updated | June 25, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07036965 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults over 18 with symptomatic, drug-refractory AF, CHA2DS2-VA score ≥ 2, and either a need for anticoagulation or high bleeding risk (HAS-BLED ≥ 3) who are candidates for combined PFA and LAAC are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with persistent AF longer than 1 year, AF due to reversible causes, left atrial diameter >50 mm, or imaging evidence of left atrial/LAA thrombus are excluded and unlikely to benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Adults with symptomatic, drug-refractory AF and elevated stroke risk will undergo pulsed-field ablation using either the CardiPulse or FaraPulse catheter combined with left atrial appendage closure following an "ablation-first" approach. The protocol tracks procedural success (pulmonary vein isolation and LAAC implantation) and safety outcomes, with special attention to arcing when metallic implants are present and to post-ablation tissue edema. Device-specific parameters (voltage, pulse width, number of cycles) will be recorded to compare lesion depth and area between systems. Participants will have clinical and imaging follow-up to capture AF recurrence, device performance, and adverse events.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the comparison could identify the safer and more effective PFA catheter and improve combined AF ablation plus LAAC outcomes while reducing complications like arcing and tissue edema.
How similar studies have gone: Small prior reports have shown that combined PFA and LAAC can be feasible and appear safe with few reports of edema, but no large-scale trials have directly compared different PFA systems.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Older than 18 years. 2. Diagnosed with drug-refractory, symptomatic atrial fibrillation. 3. The patient has a high risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VA score ≥ 2). 4. Have a situation of: 1. requires oral anticoagulation therapy 2. high bleeding risk (HAS-BLED score ≥ 3) that unsuitable for or unwilling to undergo long-term oral anticoagulation therapy. 5. Subjects are able to understand the purpose of the study, voluntarily participate in the study and sign the informed consent, and are willing to complete the follow-up according to the requirements of the program. Exclusion Criteria: 1. History of persistent atrial fibrillation \>1 year. 2. Atrial fibrillation was secondary to thyroid disease or other reversible reasons. 3. Left atrial anteroposterior diameter \>50 mm. 4. Evidence of left atrial or left atrial appendage thrombus on imaging examination. 5. Concurrent other arrhythmias required for catheter ablation (e.g., atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, pre-excitation syndrome) prior to enrollment. 6. Rheumatic heart disease. 7. Left ventricular ejection fraction \<40% or New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV. 8. Unstable angina. 9. Myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 3 months prior to enrollment. 10. History of prior left atrial appendage closure, patent foramen ovale closure, atrial septal defect closure, or repair surgery. 11. Implantation of a mechanical mitral valve prosthesis or metallic annuloplasty rings. 12. Presence of intracardiac thrombus, space-occupying lesions, or other abnormalities that preclude vascular access or catheter manipulation. 13. Contraindications to anticoagulation or history of coagulation disorders/abnormal bleeding. 14. Active systemic infection. 15. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 mL/min/1.73 m² or history of renal dialysis. 16. Pregnancy or breastfeeding. 17. Life expectancy \<12 months (e.g., advanced malignancy). 18. Current or anticipated participation in other drug or device clinical trials. 19. Any other condition or abnormality deemed by the investigator to warrant exclusion.
Where it's running
-
Ningbo First Hospital
Hangzhou, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Huimin Chu, Dorctor
- Email: epnbheart@163.com
- Phone: +86 574-87085211
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Pulsed Field vs Cryoballoon for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation can shorten the procedure for first-time PVI in AF patients compared with cryoballoon ablation, while keeping safety and effectiveness similar.
-
Pulsed Field Ablation vs Cryoablation for Atrial Fibrillation Under Deep Sedation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation (PFA) done under deep sedation works as well as cryoballoon ablation for treating atrial fibrillation, aiming to avoid general anesthesia.
-
Bachmann’s Bundle Pacing vs Right Atrial Appendage Pacing for AF
This study tests two common atrial pacing methods to see which one is safer over 12 months for people getting a new pacemaker, ICD, or CRT device.
-
AI-powered ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes in heart disease
Researchers test an AI-enhanced ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes for people with cardiovascular diseases.
-
Pace-and-ablate strategy in atrial fibrillation: who benefits and long-term outcomes
This study looks at adults with atrial fibrillation who underwent AV node ablation with permanent pacing to see who develops pacing-induced problems and how they do long-term.
-
AI-based cardiac analysis using 12-lead and 1-lead ECG
A clinician-facing pilot test to see if SmartECG-EF helps evaluate heart function using both 12-lead and single-lead ECGs in adults with heart conditions.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.