Comparing two pain relief techniques for shoulder surgery
Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy Between the Interscalene Block and Infraspinatus-Teres Minor Interfascial Blocks in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
This study is testing which of two pain relief methods works better for people having shoulder surgery to see if one can help manage pain without affecting breathing.
Quick facts
| Phase | Not applicable |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Sponsor | Samsun University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Samsun) |
| Trial ID | NCT06844630 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
What this trial studies
This study compares the effectiveness of two different ultrasound-guided nerve blocks, the interscalene block and the infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block, in managing postoperative pain for patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery. The goal is to determine if there is any significant difference in pain relief between these two techniques, particularly focusing on the potential for diaphragm-sparing benefits of the infraspinatus-teres minor block. Both techniques aim to provide effective analgesia while minimizing complications associated with nerve blocks. The study will involve preoperative application of these blocks to assess their impact on postoperative pain management.
Who should consider this trial
Good fit: Ideal candidates for this study are patients classified as ASA I-III who are scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia.
Not a fit: Patients with bleeding disorders, those on anticoagulant therapy, or individuals with chronic pain syndromes requiring opioid intake may not benefit from this study.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved pain management strategies for patients undergoing shoulder surgery, potentially reducing recovery time and hospital stays.
How similar studies have performed: While the interscalene block is a well-established technique, the infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block is a newer approach, and its comparative effectiveness is still being evaluated.
Eligibility criteria
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II-III * Scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia Exclusion Criteria: * history of bleeding diathesis * receiving anticoagulant treatment * infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture * pregnancy or lactation * patients who do not accept the procedure * Allergy to local anesthetics * Chronic pain syndromes requiring opioid intake
Where this trial is running
Samsun
- Samsun University — Samsun, Turkey (Recruiting)
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Kadem Koç
- Email: kademkoc.md@gmail.com
- Phone: (0362) 311 15 00
How to participate
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
- Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.