Comparing two pain relief techniques after lung surgery
Comparison Of The Analgesic Effect Of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block And Ultrasound-Guided Retrolaminar Block In Patients Undergoing Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Study.
This study is testing which of two pain relief methods works better for people having lung surgery to help them feel less pain afterward.
Quick facts
| Phase | Not applicable |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Enrollment | 44 (estimated) |
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Sponsor | Cairo University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Cairo) |
| Trial ID | NCT06021327 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
What this trial studies
This study evaluates the effectiveness of two regional anesthesia techniques, the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and the Retrolaminar Block (RLB), in managing post-operative pain for patients undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS). Given the challenges of post-surgical pain, which can lead to increased morbidity, the study aims to determine which technique provides better analgesia. Both methods involve administering local anesthetics in the thoracic region, but they differ in their approach and potential effectiveness. The study will include patients classified as ASA I, II, or III who are scheduled for VATS.
Who should consider this trial
Good fit: Ideal candidates are patients classified as ASA I, II, or III who are scheduled to undergo Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.
Not a fit: Patients with coagulopathy, severe obesity, or those who have had previous thoracic surgery may not benefit from this study.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved pain management strategies for patients undergoing lung surgery, enhancing their recovery experience.
How similar studies have performed: Previous studies have shown promising results for both ESPB and RLB in providing analgesia after thoracic surgeries, indicating that this approach is supported by existing evidence.
Eligibility criteria
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class (ASA) I, II and III * Patients undergoing VATS. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient refusal 2. Coagulopathy, bleeding disorders, 3. In-ability to postpone anti-coagulation medications. 4. infection at the injection site 5. pregnancy, breastfeeding, 6. severe obesity (body mass index \> 35 kg/m2 ) 7. allergy to any drug used in the study 8. preoperative daily use of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or opioids, 9. Previous surgery in the thoracic vertebral region 10. Liver dysfunction. 11. Injury or a lesion at the block site.
Where this trial is running
Cairo
- Facalty of Medicine - Cairo University — Cairo, Egypt (Recruiting)
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Islam M Sayed, MS — Cairo University
- Study coordinator: Islam M Sayed, MS
- Email: i.sharr866@gmail.com
- Phone: 00201008039448
How to participate
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
- Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.