Comparing two pacing methods for heart failure treatment

Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Resynchronization Therapy in Systolic Dysfunction and Wide QRS: Mortality, Heart Failure Hospitalization or Cardiac Transplant

NA · Hospital Clinic of Barcelona · NCT06105580

This study is testing which pacing method, conduction system pacing or biventricular pacing, works better for people with heart failure to see if it can help them live longer and avoid hospital visits.

Quick facts

PhaseNA
Study typeInterventional
Enrollment320 (estimated)
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
SponsorHospital Clinic of Barcelona (other)
Locations1 site (Barcelona)
Trial IDNCT06105580 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What this trial studies

This trial compares conduction system pacing with biventricular pacing in patients suffering from systolic dysfunction and wide QRS. It aims to evaluate the impact of these two pacing strategies on all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, and the need for cardiac transplants over a 12-month follow-up period. A total of 320 patients will be randomized to receive either pacing method, and various clinical and echocardiographic parameters will be assessed to determine the effectiveness of each approach. The study also seeks to identify predictors of response to the different pacing strategies using advanced imaging techniques.

Who should consider this trial

Good fit: Ideal candidates include adults aged 18 and older with specific types of heart block and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.

Not a fit: Patients with recent myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or those currently pregnant may not benefit from this study.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide insights into more effective pacing strategies for patients with heart failure, potentially improving survival and quality of life.

How similar studies have performed: Previous studies have shown promising results for conduction system pacing, suggesting potential benefits similar to those of biventricular pacing, but this specific comparison is novel.

Eligibility criteria

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patient must indicate acceptance to participate in the study by signing an informed consent document.
* Patient must be ≥ 18 years of age.
* Left bundle branch block, QRS ≥130 and LVEF \<=35%. No indication of stimulation for AV block.
* Non-left bundle branch block, QRS ≥150 and LVEF \<=35%.
* Resynchronization therapy indication for ventricular dysfunction (LVEF \<40%) and indication of cardiac pacing for AV block.
* LVEF \<=35% in NYHA class III or IV, atrial fibrillation and intrinsic QRS \>=130 ms, provided a strategy to ensure biventricular capture is in place.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Myocardial infarction, unstable angina or cardiac revascularization during the previous 3 months.
* Pregnancy.
* Participating currently in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment.

Where this trial is running

Barcelona

Study contacts

How to participate

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Conditions: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Heart Failure, left bundle branch pacing, biventricular pacing, cardiac resynchronization therapy

Last reviewed 2026-05-15 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.