Comparing two methods for treating scaphoid bone healing issues
Official title: Arthroscopic Versus Open Cancellous Bone Grafting for Scaphoid Delayed/Non-union in Adults: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial
Run by Herlev and Gentofte Hospital · NCT05574582 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing two different surgical methods to see which one helps people with delayed or non-healing scaphoid fractures recover better.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 68 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 88 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Herlev and Gentofte Hospital Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Hellerup) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 15, 2023 |
| Main results expected | January 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | January 1, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | March 1, 2023 |
| Trial ID | NCT05574582 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are Danish citizens aged 18-68 with scaphoid delayed or non-union fractures.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with open fractures, previous failed surgeries for scaphoid issues, or significant deformities may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial investigates the effectiveness of two surgical techniques for treating scaphoid delayed and non-union fractures. Eighty-eight patients aged 18-68 will be randomly assigned to receive either an open iliac crest cancellous graft or an arthroscopic-assisted distal radius cancellous chip graft. The primary outcome measured will be the time to union, assessed through repeated CT scans over a 10-week period. The study aims to provide insights into which method may lead to better healing outcomes for patients with these specific fractures.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved healing rates and recovery times for patients with scaphoid fractures.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown varying success with different grafting techniques for scaphoid fractures, but this specific comparison is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients aged 18-68 years. 2. A scaphoid fracture without healing 2-6 months since fracture (delayed union) for cases with either displacement \>1mm or comminution and failed non-operative treatment. 3. Scaphoid fracture without healing \>6 months since fracture (non-union) regardless of displacement, comminution and if previous non-operative treatment has been tried. 4. ASA 1-3. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Open fractures 2. Associated trans-scaphoid perilunate dislocation. 3. Associated fracture in the hand/upper extremity. 4. Previous failed surgical treatment for scaphoid delayed/non-union. 5. Stage 2 SNAC or above. 6. Avascular necrosis of the proximal pole as evaluated with MRI and absence of punctate bleeding intraoperatively. 7. Patients with gross humpback deformity of HLR \>0.75 and/or DCA \<70⁰. 8. Patients unable to understand instructions in Danish, complete the rehabilitation protocol, or answering the questionnaires because of physical or cognitive impairment, as evaluated by the surgeon at the first visit.
Where it's running
-
University Hospital Herlev/Gentofte, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Clinic for Shoulder-, Elbow- and Hand Surgery, Hellerup, Denmark
Hellerup, Denmark Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Robert Gvozdenoviz, MD — Orthopedic department, Copenhagen university hospital Gentofte Hospital
- Study coordinator: Morten Kjaer, MD
- Email: morten.kjaer.02@regionh.dk
- Phone: +45 38672111
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing two techniques for wrist fusion in patients with post-traumatic arthritis
This study is testing two different surgery techniques for wrist fusion to see which one helps adults with post-traumatic arthritis feel better and regain more movement in their wrists.
-
Recovery, quality of life, and physical function after partial or radical nephrectomy
This study tests recovery, quality of life, and physical function before and after nephrectomy to see how patients fare depending on the surgery type.
-
Platelet-Rich Plasma for Erectile Dysfunction After Prostate Surgery
This trial tests whether injecting a patient’s own platelet-rich plasma can improve erectile function in men who have persistent ED more than a year after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
-
Four CBT-E formats for Binge Eating Disorder in adults
This trial tests four different psychotherapy formats to see which best reduces binge-eating episodes in adults with Binge Eating Disorder.
-
Blood biomarkers to help tell if a lung nodule is cancer or not
A blood test-based approach is being tested to see if biomarkers can help determine whether a detected lung nodule is malignant or benign in patients referred for further evaluation.
-
Strengthening compassion in hospital care at Herlev and Gentofte
This project will test whether translated questionnaires can reliably measure compassion for Danish patients and healthcare staff at Herlev and Gentofte Hospital.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.