Comparing two methods for draining fluid from the lungs in emergency departments
Official title: Strategy for Prompt and Effective Thoracentesis in the Emergency Department: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial
Run by University of Aarhus · NCT06180603 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests which method works better for draining fluid from the lungs in emergency departments: doing it manually or letting gravity do the work.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 188 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Aarhus Academic / other |
| Locations | 6 sites (Aarhus, Central Jutland and 5 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 15, 2024 |
| Main results expected | November 30, 2025 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | December 5, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT06180603 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adults aged 18 and older who have a clinically justified need for thoracentesis due to pleural effusion.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients experiencing life-threatening respiratory distress or those unable to provide consent will not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The SPEEDTAP-trial is a multicenter clinical trial that investigates two different methods for performing thoracentesis in emergency departments. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either manual fluid removal in the emergency department or passive fluid drainage using gravity in the radiology department. The primary goal is to determine which method allows for quicker drainage of pleural effusions, with secondary outcomes including length of hospital stay and safety measures. A total of 188 patients will be included in this study across four emergency departments in Central Denmark.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to faster and more effective treatment for patients with pleural effusions, improving their overall outcomes.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have explored thoracentesis methods, but this specific comparison of manual versus gravity drainage in emergency settings is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients ≥ 18 years admitted to the ED * Pleural effusion detected by any imaging modality (e.g., bedside ultrasound, chest x-ray, computed tomography) * Clinically justified need for thoracentesis ( symptomatic relief and/or define the etiology of the effusion * Without contraindication for thoracentesis in the emergency department (e.g., anticoagulant treatment) Exclusion Criteria: * Life-threatening respiratory distress * Not able to give consent * Previous pleurodesis * Effusion does not appear free-flowing due to septations or loculations / suspected empyema * Prior enrollment in the trial * If randomization is not possible because decision to insert a pigtail catheter is made in the radiology department
Where it's running
-
Horsens Regional Hospital
Horsens, Central Jutland, Denmark Recruiting -
Randers Regional Hospital
Randers, Central Jutland, Denmark Recruiting -
Aalborg University Hospital
Aalborg, North Denmark, Denmark Recruiting -
Esbjerg sygehus
Esbjerg, South Region Denmark, Denmark Recruiting -
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, Central Jutland, Denmark Not yet recruiting -
Gødstrup Regional Hospital
Gødstrup, Central Jutland, Denmark Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Sandra T Langsted — Aarhus University Hospital
- Study coordinator: Sandra T Langsted
- Email: sandra.langsted@clin.au.dk
- Phone: +45 20 27 65 12
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Using Apple Watch data to predict heart failure outcomes
This study is testing if data from Apple Watches can help predict heart failure problems and the chances of needing to go back to the hospital for patients with heart failure.
-
Using confocal laser endomicroscopy during medical thoracoscopy to diagnose pleural disease
This trial tests whether using confocal laser endomicroscopy during thoracoscopy helps doctors find the cause of unexplained fibrinous pleurisy in adults.
-
Comparing Aortix Device to Diuretics for Acute Heart Failure
This study is testing whether the Aortix device can help people with acute heart failure who aren't responding to diuretics feel better compared to standard treatment.
-
Myocardial Energetics Across Cardiovascular Disease Spectrum Using 31P-MRS
Researchers are testing whether phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS) can map heart energy metabolism across healthy people and patients with various heart conditions.
-
Tailored digital support to cut sedentary time in long-term cardiac rehab
In adults in a long-term cardiac rehabilitation program, this study tests whether a personalized behavioural program with digital tools can reduce daily sitting time.
-
NT-proBNP–guided heart failure screening for people 65+ in rural China
This study tests whether using NT-proBNP blood tests to guide heart failure screening in adults 65 and older in rural China can find unrecognized heart problems more effectively than symptom-based screening.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.