Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages Any age to 18

Comparing two imaging methods for evaluating neuroblastoma in children

Official title: 18F-mFBG LAFOV PET/CT Compared to 123I-mIBG Scintigraphy SPECT/CT for Evaluation of Children With Neuroblastoma

Run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet · NCT05826158 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing which imaging method works better for spotting neuroblastoma in children by comparing two different techniques.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
AgesAny age to 18 Years
SexAll
Enrollment25 (estimated)
SponsorCopenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Academic / other
Drugs / interventionschemotherapy, immunotherapy
Locations1 site (Copenhagen)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJune 6, 2022
Main results expectedSeptember 1, 2025
Study endsDecember 31, 2025
Registry record updatedNovember 15, 2024
Trial IDNCT05826158 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are children with a confirmed or presumed diagnosis of neuroblastoma who are scheduled for imaging evaluations.

Probably not a fit

Patients who have received chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy between imaging studies may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This study evaluates the effectiveness of 18F-mFBG PET imaging compared to 123I-mIBG scintigraphy in children diagnosed with neuroblastoma. Participants must have a confirmed or presumed diagnosis of neuroblastoma and will undergo both imaging techniques within a specified timeframe. The results will be analyzed by independent teams of specialists to determine the accuracy of each imaging method in identifying neuroblastoma. The goal is to assess which imaging technique provides better diagnostic performance.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve the accuracy of neuroblastoma diagnosis in children, leading to better treatment decisions.

How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown promising results with similar imaging techniques, but this specific comparison is novel.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. An established diagnosis of neuroblastoma based on unequivocal histopathology from tissue obtained at any time prior to enrolment in the trial; OR b) A presumed diagnosis of neuroblastoma based on signs, symptoms, physical examination, imaging findings, and laboratory and genetic test results, including individuals in whom therapy has already been empirically initiated.
2. The subject has undergone or is scheduled to undergo evaluation of neuroblastoma disease status, including 123I-mIBG +/- 7 days to the date of 18F-mFBG imaging, with no therapy between such evaluation.
3. Ability of subject or subject's legal guardian to understand and sign a written informed consent document.

   \-

   Exclusion Criteria:

1\. Pregnancy

\-

Where it's running

  • Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Recruiting

Study contacts

  • Principal investigator: Lise Borgwardt, MD, PhD. — Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
  • Study coordinator: Lise Borgwardt, MD, PhD.
  • Email: lise.borgwardt@regionh.dk
  • Phone: +4535459568

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.