Comparing two gum‑repositioning surgeries with connective tissue grafts for multiple recessions in the lower front teeth
Official title: An RCT Between Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) and Tunneled Coronally Advanced Flap (TCAF) in Combination With Soft Tissue Graft for Multiple Recession Coverage.
Run by University Hospital, Ghent · NCT06940050 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether the coronally advanced flap (CAF) or the tunneled coronally advanced flap (TCAF), both with connective tissue grafts, gives better root coverage for people with multiple gum recessions on their lower front teeth.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 34 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University Hospital, Ghent Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 30, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2036 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2037 |
| Registry record updated | October 1, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06940050 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (≥18) in good general health and with good oral hygiene who have at least two adjacent recessions in the lower front (premandibular) region and who are non-smokers and not pregnant.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who smoke, are pregnant, have poor oral hygiene, significant systemic health issues, or only isolated single recessions may not benefit or may be ineligible.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized controlled trial at Ghent University compares two surgical approaches—CAF and TCAF—each combined with a connective tissue graft to treat multiple adjacent gingival recessions in the premandible. Adult patients with at least two recessions, good oral hygiene, and good general health are randomized to one of the two techniques and followed over short- and long-term visits to measure root coverage. Key exclusions include current smoking and pregnancy. The main outcome is average root coverage achieved with each technique, with secondary interest in symptom relief, aesthetics, and periodontal stability.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the better technique could provide more predictable root coverage, reducing tooth sensitivity, improving appearance, and making oral hygiene easier.
How similar studies have gone: Both CAF and tunnel techniques combined with connective tissue grafts are well established and have shown good root coverage in prior studies, while the combined TCAF approach is a more recent variation with less long‑term data.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * at least 18 years old * good oral hygiene * presence of at least 2 recessions in the premandible * good general health Exclusion Criteria: * smoker * pregnant women (assessed at each visit; if the patient appears pregnant during follow-up, x-rays will not be taken)
Where it's running
-
Department of Periodontology and Implantology of Ghent University
Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Véronique Prof. Dr. Christiaens
- Email: vchristi.christiaens@ugent.be
- Phone: +32 332 40 17
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
CAF versus TCAF with connective tissue grafts for multiple maxillary gum recessions
This comparison will test whether coronally advanced flap (CAF) or tunneled coronally advanced flap (TCAF), each combined with a connective tissue graft, provides better root coverage for adults with multiple gum recessions in the upper jaw.
-
TCAF versus MTUN with soft tissue grafts for a single gum recession in the lower premolar area
This compares whether a tunneled coronally advanced flap (TCAF) or a modified tunnel (MTUN), each combined with a connective tissue graft, gives better root coverage for adults with a single gum recession in the lower premolar area.
-
Can a preoperative photo predict root coverage success after gum surgery?
Researchers test whether a preoperative intraoral photo can predict six-month root coverage after a specific gum recession surgery in adults with Cairo RT1-RT3 recessions.
-
Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy and Hyaluronic Acid After Free Gingival Graft
This trial tests if applying low-level laser therapy or hyaluronic acid after free gingival graft helps healing in adults with insufficient keratinized tissue in the lower front teeth.
-
Keratinized tissue and attached gingiva width in root coverage with a minimally invasive graft technique
This study tests whether the width of keratinized tissue and attached gingiva affect root coverage outcomes after a minimally invasive gum graft procedure for RT1 recession defects.
-
Managing pain after free gingival graft harvesting with Ora-Aid versus an acrylic palatal stent
This trial will test whether an Ora-Aid hydrogel dressing or an acrylic palatal stent better reduces pain for adults after free gingival graft donor-site harvesting.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.