Comparing two devices for inducing labor in women with a previous C-section
Official title: Balloon Catheter vs. Hygroscopic Cervical Dilator for Labour Induction After Previous Caesarean Section: an Open Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern · NCT06506721 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing two devices to see which one helps women who had a previous C-section have a quicker and safer labor.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 137 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Bern) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 29, 2023 |
| Main results expected | December 28, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 28, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | January 14, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06506721 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are women aged 18 and older with a previous cesarean section and an indication for labor induction between 24-42 weeks of pregnancy.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with multiple cesarean sections, certain pregnancy complications, or contraindications to labor induction will not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two mechanical devices, the Dilapan-S and the Cook Balloon, for inducing labor in women who have previously undergone a cesarean section. The primary focus is on the time from device placement to delivery, while secondary outcomes include the rate of cesarean deliveries and patient satisfaction. The study addresses a gap in data regarding labor induction methods for this specific patient group, as current practices often involve off-label use of these devices. Participants will be carefully selected based on their medical history and current pregnancy status.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide safer and more effective options for labor induction in women with a history of cesarean delivery.
How similar studies have gone: While there is limited data on the direct comparison of these two devices, similar studies on mechanical induction methods have shown promising results.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * All women \>= 18years old with a previous CS and an indication of labour induction, between 24-42 weeks of pregnancy. * Modified Bishop-Score \< 6 * Informed consent Exclusion criteria: * More than 1 CS * Premature rupture of membranes * Vaginal infection * Intrauterine fetal demise * Twin pregnancy * Contraindication against labour induction or vaginal delivery * Vaginal bleeding * Simultaneous external administration of prostaglandins planned * Placenta praevia, vasa praevia or placenta accreta spectrum * Transverse fetal orientation * Prolapsed umbilical cord * Prior hysterotomy, classic uterine incision, myomectomy or any other full thickness uterine incision (except C-section) * Pelvic structural anomaly * Active genital herpes infection * Invasive cervical cancer * Abnormal fetal heart rate pattern * Breech presentation * Maternal heart disease * Polyhydramnios * Presentic part above the pelvic inlet * Severe maternal hypertension
Where it's running
-
University Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynäkologie, Inselspital
Bern, Switzerland Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Daniel Surbek, Prof. Dr. — Co-Chairman, Departament of Obstetrics an Gynäkology, Head of Obstetrics and feto-maternal Medicine, University Hospital Bern
- Study coordinator: Anda P Radan, PD Dr. med.
- Email: Anda-Petronela.Radan@insel.ch
- Phone: +41/0316321010
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Restore a newborn's gut microbiota using the mother's microbes.
This will test whether giving C-section newborns bacteria from their own mother or commercial probiotics helps their gut microbiota become more like babies born vaginally.
-
Effects of massage and exercises on cesarean scar and recovery
This study tests whether direct scar massage or indirect massage plus exercise helps people recover after a cesarean birth and reduces scar-related pain.
-
Reflexology and hand massage after cesarean section
This study tests whether reflexology hand massage or stroking hand massage can reduce anxiety and increase satisfaction, and how they affect heart/blood pressure after cesarean delivery.
-
Health education to see if primigravida women choose vaginal delivery more often
A health education program is being tested to see if it helps first-time pregnant women in choosing vaginal delivery over unnecessary cesareans.
-
Enhanced Recovery Adherence and Recovery Quality After Cesarean Delivery
This study tests whether following enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery protocols is linked with better recovery quality in women having a planned cesarean with spinal anesthesia.
-
Predictors of severe pain within 24 hours after cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia
This study will look at which pre-, intra-, and post-operative factors are linked to severe pain in the first 24 hours after an elective cesarean done with spinal anesthesia.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.