Comparing two bonding methods for hybrid ceramic laminate veneers
Clinical Performance of Hybrid Ceramic Laminate Veneers With Two Pretreatment Protocols: A Randomized Clinical Trial
This trial tests whether BeautiBond Xtreme or HC Primer gives better bonding and appearance for adults receiving hybrid ceramic laminate veneers.
Quick facts
| Phase | Not applicable |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Enrollment | 28 (estimated) |
| Ages | 21 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Sponsor | Cairo University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Cairo) |
| Trial ID | NCT07027709 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
What this trial studies
This randomized controlled trial enrolls adults needing laminate veneers in the esthetic zone and randomizes each case to one of two pretreatment protocols before cementation with BeautiLink SA resin cement. Veneers are fabricated from HC hard blocks and receive either BeautiBond Xtreme pretreatment or HC Primer prior to cementation. Patients are followed for 18 months with standardized clinical checks to record marginal adaptation, retention, discoloration, and recurrent caries. The trial compares outcomes between the two groups to determine which bonding protocol provides superior short-term clinical performance.
Who should consider this trial
Good fit: Ideal candidates are adults aged 21 or older who need laminate veneers in the esthetic zone, have sufficient enamel on vital or endodontically treated teeth, and can consent and attend follow-up visits.
Not a fit: Patients with active periodontal disease, bruxism, poor oral hygiene, pregnancy, significant systemic illness, known material allergies, insufficient enamel, ongoing orthodontic treatment, or current participation in other trials are unlikely to benefit from this protocol.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could identify a bonding protocol that produces more durable, better-looking laminate veneers for patients.
How similar studies have performed: Previous studies of adhesive protocols and self-adhesive resin cements have shown generally favorable results for marginal adaptation and retention, though direct head-to-head data for these exact product combinations are limited.
Eligibility criteria
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:dult patients ≥ 21 years requiring laminate veneers in the esthetic zone, vital or endodontically treated teeth, sufficient enamel, willing and able to consent and comply. \- Exclusion Criteria: Periodontal disease, bruxism, poor hygiene, pregnancy, systemic illness, allergies, insufficient enamel, ongoing trials, orthodontic treatment. \-
Where this trial is running
Cairo
- Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University — Cairo, Egypt (Recruiting)
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: omnia Mohammed Wafik, lecturer
- Email: omniawafik@gmail.com
- Phone: 00201006595375
How to participate
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
- Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.