Comparing treosulfan and clofarabine before stem cell transplant for blood cancers
A Phase II Randomized Study to Assess Outcomes With Treosulfan-Based Versus Clofarabine-Based Conditioning in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Excess Blasts (MDS-EB), or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT)
This study is testing whether a treatment plan using treosulfan or clofarabine before a stem cell transplant can help people with blood cancers like myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia do better after the transplant.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 2 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Enrollment | 80 (estimated) |
| Ages | 18 Years to 70 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Sponsor | Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | fludarabine, Chemotherapy |
| Locations | 1 site (Seattle, Washington) |
| Trial ID | NCT04994808 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
What this trial studies
This phase II trial investigates the effectiveness of treosulfan-based versus clofarabine-based conditioning regimens prior to donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia. Patients are randomized into two arms, receiving either treosulfan with fludarabine and total-body irradiation or clofarabine with total-body irradiation before the transplant. The study aims to evaluate the impact of these conditioning regimens on patient outcomes, including the ability to eliminate cancer cells and support healthy blood cell production post-transplant. Participants will be monitored for several years following the transplant to assess long-term effects and outcomes.
Who should consider this trial
Good fit: Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 to 75 with a diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia and specific eligibility criteria.
Not a fit: Patients with circulating leukemic blasts or those who do not meet the specified health criteria may not benefit from this study.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve treatment outcomes for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia undergoing stem cell transplantation.
How similar studies have performed: Other studies have explored conditioning regimens for stem cell transplants, but this specific comparison of treosulfan and clofarabine is novel.
Eligibility criteria
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age \>= 18 years and =\< 75 years
* Diagnosis of MDS-EB or AML: must have \< 5% marrow blasts (by morphology and/or flow cytometry) at time of transplant
* Karnofsky performance score (KPS) \>= 60% on pre-HCT evaluation
* Able to give informed consent
* Patients with previous autologous or allogeneic HCT may enroll
* DONOR: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical related donors or unrelated donors matched for HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, and DQB1 as defined by high resolution deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) typing; mismatch for only one HLA allele at class I is allowed
* DONOR: Donors able to undergo peripheral blood stem cell collection. Only granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) will be permitted as an hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) source on this protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
* Presence of circulating blasts (in the blood) detected by standard pathology for patients with AML
* Presence of \>= 5% circulating leukemic blasts (in the blood) detected by standard pathology for patients with MDS-EB
* Patients with promyelocytic AML
* Organ dysfunction
* Cardiac: Ejection fraction \< 35% (or, if unable to obtain ejection fraction, shortening fraction of \< 26%) or cardiac insufficiency requiring treatment or symptomatic coronary artery disease. Patients with a shortening fraction \< 26% may be enrolled if approved by a cardiologist
* Pulmonary:
* Diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) \< 40%, total lung capacity (TLC) \< 40%, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) \< 40% and/or receiving supplementary continuous oxygen. When pulmonary function test (PFT)s cannot be obtained, the 6-minute walk test (6 minute walk functional test \[6MWT\], also known as exercise oximetry) will be used: Any patient with oxygen saturation on room air of \< 89% during a 6MWT will be excluded
* The principal investigator (PI) must approve enrollment of all patients with pulmonary nodules
* Renal: Serum creatinine should be within normal limits as specified by Standard Practice guidelines. For subjects with serum creatinine \> upper limit of normal, a 24-hour creatinine clearance will be performed and should be equal to or more than the lower limit of normal
* Hepatic: Patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of liver disease will be evaluated for the cause of liver disease, its clinical severity in terms of liver function, and the degree of portal hypertension. Patients will be excluded if they are found to have fulminant liver failure, cirrhosis of the liver with evidence of portal hypertension, alcoholic hepatitis, esophageal varices, a history of bleeding esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, uncorrectable hepatic synthetic dysfunction evidenced by prolongation of the prothrombin time, ascites related to portal hypertension, bridging fibrosis, bacterial or fungal liver abscess, biliary obstruction, chronic viral hepatitis with total serum bilirubin \> 3 mg/dL, or symptomatic biliary disease
* With active infectious disease requiring deferral of conditioning, as recommended by an infectious disease specialist
* Fungal infections with radiological progression after receipt of amphotericin B or active triazole for greater than 1 month
* With human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positivity or active infectious hepatitis because of possible risk of lethal infection when treated with immunosuppressive therapy
* With central nervous system (CNS) leukemia at the time of treatment
* Patients with active non-hematologic malignancies (except non-melanoma skin cancers) or those with non-hematologic malignancies (except non-melanoma skin cancers) who have been rendered with no evidence of disease but have a greater than 20% chance of having disease recurrence within five years. This exclusion does not apply to patients with non-hematologic malignancies that do not require therapy
* With life expectancy severely limited by diseases other than malignancy
* Fertile men and women unwilling to used contraceptive techniques during treatment and for 12 months following
* Women who are pregnant or lactating
* With known hypersensitivity to treosulfan, fludarabine, or clofarabine
* The use of non-Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved investigational drugs would not be allowed within 4 weeks of the initiation of conditioning (day -6 for both arms)
* Unable to give informed consent
* Patients suitable for and willing to receive a standard high intensity preparative regimen
* DONOR: Donor (or centers) who will exclusively donate marrow
* DONOR: Donors who are HIV-positive and/or, medical conditions that would result in increased risk for G-CSF mobilization and harvest of PBSC
* DONOR: Donors are excluded when preexisting immunoreactivity is identified that would jeopardize donor hematopoietic cell engraftment. This determination is based on the standard practice of the individual institution. The recommended procedure for patients with 10 of 10 HLA allele level (phenotypic) match is to obtain a panel reactive antibody (PRA) screens to class I and class II antigens for all patients before HCT. If the PRA shows \> 10% activity, then flow cytometric or B and T cell cytotoxic cross matches should be obtained. The donor should be excluded if any of the cytotoxic cross match assays are positive. For those patients with an HLA Class I allele mismatch, flow cytometric or B and T cell cytotoxic cross matches should be obtained regardless of the PRA results. A positive anti-donor cytotoxic cross match is an absolute donor exclusion
* DONOR: Donor is excluded if a patient is homozygous in the graft-rejection vector against the donor's mismatched HLA class I allele
Where this trial is running
Seattle, Washington
- Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium — Seattle, Washington, United States (Recruiting)
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Phuong Vo — Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
- Study coordinator: Phuong Vo
- Email: ptvo@fredhutch.org
- Phone: 206.667.2749
How to participate
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
- Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.