Comparing treatment sequences for older patients with IDH mutated acute myeloid leukemia
Official title: Randomized, Sequential, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of IDH Targeted/Non- Targeted Versus Non-targeted/IDH-targeted Approaches in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed IDH Mutated AML Patients Not Candidates for Intensive Induction Therapy (I- DATA Study)
Run by Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center · NCT05401097 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing which order of treatments works better for older patients with a specific type of leukemia that can't handle intensive therapy, by comparing an IDH inhibitor with venetoclax, both combined with azacitidine.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 2 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 125 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | chemotherapy |
| Locations | 4 sites (Aurora, Colorado and 3 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 13, 2022 |
| Main results expected | September 30, 2027 |
| Study ends | June 30, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | June 23, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT05401097 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 and older with newly diagnosed IDH1 or IDH2 mutated AML who are not suitable for intensive chemotherapy.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with non-IDH mutated AML or those who are candidates for intensive induction therapy may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This phase II study evaluates the effectiveness of two different treatment sequences for older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have mutations in the IDH1 or IDH2 genes and are not candidates for intensive induction therapy. Patients will be randomized to receive either an IDH inhibitor followed by venetoclax or vice versa, both in combination with azacitidine. The study aims to determine which treatment order results in better overall treatment outcomes, including survival rates and response durations, while also assessing the toxicity profiles of each approach.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a more effective treatment strategy for older patients with IDH mutated AML, potentially improving their survival and quality of life.
How similar studies have gone: While there have been studies on IDH inhibitors and venetoclax individually, this specific comparison of treatment sequences is novel and has not been extensively tested.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with newly diagnosed IDH1 or IDH2 mutated AML * Not a candidate for or refuses intensive induction therapy * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 * Creatinine clearance \> 40 ml/min * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/ alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \< 5 x upper limit of normal * Total bilirubin \< 1.5 x upper limit of normal (except for patients with Gilbert's disease) * At the time of Venetoclax initiation, white blood cells (WBC) needs to be \< 25 × 103 microliter: Hydroxyurea can be used to achieve that level. * For female patients of childbearing potential, willingness to abstain from heterosexual intercourse or use a protocol-recommended method of contraception from the screening visit throughout the study treatment period and for 6 months following the last dose of either study drug. A serum pregnancy test will be done at screening. A serum or urine pregnancy test will be done on Day 1 of each cycle for women of childbearing potential. If the urine pregnancy test is positive, a serum pregnancy test must be performed per institutional standards. The following methods are acceptable methods of contraception for the purpose of this study: * Highly Effective Contraception Methods that can achieve a failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly are considered as highly effective birth control methods (Clinical Trials Facilitation Group 2014): * Combined (estrogen and progestin containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, transdermal). * Progestin-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable, implantable). * Intrauterine device. * Intrauterine hormone-releasing system. * Bilateral tubal occlusion. * Vasectomized partner, provided that partner is the sole sexual partner of the female study participant and that the vasectomized partner has received medical assessment of the surgical success. * Sexual abstinence- only if defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the study treatments. The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical study and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient. * Acceptable Birth Control Methods that are not Highly Effective Contraception Acceptable birth control methods that result in a failure rate of more than 1% per year: * Progestin-only oral hormonal contraception, where inhibition of ovulation is not the primary mode of action. * Male or female condom with or without spermicide. * Cap, diaphragm, or sponge with spermicide. A combination of male condom with either cap, diaphragm, or sponge with spermicide (double barrier methods) are also acceptable, but not highly effective, birth control methods. * The following methods are NOT acceptable methods of contraception for the purpose of this study: * Periodic abstinence (calendar, symptothermal, postovulation methods). * Withdrawal (coitus interruptus). * Spermicides only. * Lactational amenorrhea method. * Combination of male and female condom * For male patients of childbearing potential having intercourse with females of childbearing potential, the willingness to abstain from heterosexual intercourse or use a protocol recommended method of contraception from the screening visit throughout the study treatment period and for 3 months following the last dose of either study drug. Males must also refrain from sperm donation from the screening visit throughout the study treatment period and for 3 months following the last dose of either dose of study drug * Willingness to comply with scheduled visits, drug administration plan, imaging studies, laboratory tests, other study procedures and study restrictions Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia * Known active central nervous system involvement of leukemia * Any active malignancy requiring therapy, that would interfere with the interpretation of study endpoints. * Evidence of ongoing uncontrolled systemic bacterial, fungal or viral infection at the time of start of study treatment * Uncontrolled infection with hepatitis C, hepatitis B, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) * Pregnancy or breast feeding * Concurrent participation in an investigational drug trial with therapeutic intent defined as prior study therapy within 14 days prior to study treatment * Inability to tolerate oral medications including symptomatic disease significantly affecting gastrointestinal function such as inflammatory bowel disease or resection of stomach or small bowel
Where it's running
-
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States Recruiting -
UNC Hospitals, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States Recruiting -
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States Recruiting -
UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Dallas, Texas, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Alice S Mims, MD — Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Study coordinator: The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Email: OSUCCCClinicaltrials@osumc.edu
- Phone: 800-293-5066
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Tailored exercise program to improve quality of life for adults with hematologic cancers
This pilot trial tests a personalized 16-week exercise program to see if it’s feasible and helpful for adults with acute myeloid leukemia, lymphoma, or multiple myeloma after first-line treatment.
-
Characterization of CD180 Protein Expression in Myeloid Blood C cancers
This study tests how CD180 is presented on myeloid cancer cells and normal stem cells using existing patient samples from AML cases to see if it could help with diagnosis or monitoring.
-
Personalized AML: Find biomarkers to predict response to venetoclax
This study tests whether single-cell analyses can help group AML patients by biology and find biomarkers that predict who will respond to venetoclax.
-
Low-dose Liposomal Amphotericin B for preventing fungal infections in adults with blood cancers and prolonged neutropenia
This study tests whether giving a daily 50 mg dose of liposomal amphotericin B can help prevent invasive fungal infections in adults with blood cancers who have prolonged low white blood cell counts.
-
MAX-40279 with Venetoclax and Azacitidine for unfit newly diagnosed AML
This study tests MAX-40279 added to venetoclax and azacitidine in older or unfit adults newly diagnosed with AML to see if it is safe and shows activity.
-
Venetoclax and Azacitidine Consolidation After Remission in Intermediate-Risk AML
We’re testing if a venetoclax-plus-azacitidine consolidation approach works as well as standard high-dose chemotherapy for adults with intermediate-risk AML who have already achieved remission and are headed to stem cell transplant.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.