Comparing timing of gum grafts and bone regeneration for dental implants
Official title: Evaluation of Free Gingival Graft Timing in Staged Guided Bone Regeneration: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by University of Alabama at Birmingham · NCT06294587 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether doing gum surgery before or after bone treatment helps dental implants heal better and have fewer problems.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 30 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Alabama at Birmingham Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | chemotherapy, radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Birmingham, Alabama) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 12, 2024 |
| Main results expected | August 30, 2027 |
| Study ends | August 30, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | August 12, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06294587 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adults aged 18 and older who require dental implants and have insufficient alveolar ridge width for placement.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with uncontrolled medical conditions, active infections, or those undergoing cancer treatment may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial evaluates the clinical outcomes of two different treatment sequences for dental implants: performing free gingival graft (FGG) surgery before guided bone regeneration (GBR) versus performing GBR followed by FGG. The primary objective is to determine how the timing of the tissue graft affects the success of the bone regeneration process. Additionally, the study aims to assess any complications that may arise from either treatment sequence prior to implant placement. Participants will be monitored for their healing and overall outcomes following the procedures.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve the success rates of dental implants by optimizing the timing of gum grafts and bone regeneration.
How similar studies have gone: While this approach has been explored in various contexts, the specific timing comparison of FGG and GBR in this manner is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * • At least 18 years old * No uncontrolled medical conditions or medications that will affect their bone healing. * Good oral hygiene is defined as a full-mouth plaque score ≤25%11. * Must be able to read and understand the informed consent document. * Has a need for implants to replace missing tooth/teeth in at least 1 quadrant of the mouth. * Insufficient alveolar ridge width for endosseous implant placement, defined as 5 mm or less, as determined by bone sounding and CBCT scan. * The patient and/or guardian is willing and able to comply with pre-operative and post-operative diagnostic and clinical evaluations required. * The patient is not pregnant or breastfeeding. Exclusion Criteria: * Active infectious diseases. * Liver or kidney dysfunction/failure. * Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 8.5). * Active cancer treatment - such as active chemotherapy radiation therapy, or radiotherapy performed within ≤12 months from the procedure. * Taking medications that will affect their bone healing (for example, bisphosphonates and long-term anti-inflammatory medications). * Metabolic bone diseases that affect bone healing such as osteoporosis. * Pregnant or lactating women (self-reported). * Current tobacco and Marijuana smokers have 10 or more cigarettes per day, and former smokers (\> 10 cigarettes) who quit \< 10 ago (self-reported). * Poor oral hygiene. * Vertical loss of bone at the edentulous ridge. * History of periodontal disease. * The patient is pregnant or breastfeeding
Where it's running
-
Unversity of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Dentistry
Birmingham, Alabama, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Hussein Basma, DDS, MS
- Email: basma86@uab.edu
- Phone: 205-975-2888
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
One-stage ridge splitting in the back lower jaw using two techniques
This compares two surgical methods—piezo surgery versus conventional bone-disc cuts—to widen the narrow back lower jaw so dental implants can be placed in adults with limited ridge width.
-
One-stage ridge splitting in the upper jaw using piezo surgery or a bone-disc technique
We will try two ridge-splitting techniques—piezo surgery and bone discs—to widen narrow upper-jaw bone in adults needing a single-tooth implant.
-
Reconstruction of deficient atrophic ridges using a guide bone regeneration technique
This study tests which type of membrane, either a synthetic or natural one, helps people with bone loss in their jaw grow more bone after surgery.
-
Comparing two bone grafts to preserve the socket after tooth extraction
This test will compare an allograft and a bovine xenograft to see which better preserves jaw bone and gum shape after tooth extraction in healthy adults aged 21–50.
-
Using PeptiCol EZgraft for preserving tooth extraction sockets
This study tests whether a new collagen treatment called PeptiCol EZgraft can better preserve tooth extraction sites compared to a standard treatment called Regenomer.
-
Bone level changes after equicrestal versus subcrestal dental implant placement in augmented posterior mandible
This trial will try whether placing implants slightly below the bone crest (subcrestal) versus level with the crest (equicrestal) leads to less crestal bone loss in adults who had prior mandibular ridge augmentation.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.