Comparing three versus four screws for fixing femoral neck fractures
Official title: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial: Three Cancellous Screws Versus Four Cancellous Screws for Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures
Run by Peking University Third Hospital · NCT04869332 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether using three screws instead of four to fix femoral neck fractures helps patients heal better and have fewer problems over the next two years.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 290 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Peking University Third Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Beijing, Beijing Municipality) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 8, 2021 |
| Main results expected | April 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | May 3, 2021 |
| Trial ID | NCT04869332 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adults aged 18 and older with unilateral femoral neck fractures classified as AO 31-B who can provide informed consent.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients requiring open reduction for their fractures or those unable to provide voluntary consent may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial is a prospective randomized controlled study that aims to compare the effectiveness of three cancellous screws versus four cancellous screws for the internal fixation of femoral neck fractures classified as AO 31-B. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups, and their internal fixation failure rates and functional outcomes will be monitored over a follow-up period of up to two years. The study will include 290 participants, with 145 in each group, and will utilize a computer random allocation system for randomization.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide insights into the optimal number of screws needed for effective fixation of femoral neck fractures, potentially improving patient outcomes.
How similar studies have gone: While there have been studies on screw fixation techniques, this specific comparison of three versus four screws is novel and has not been extensively tested.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 years * Patients with unilateral femoral neck fractures that will be treated with internal fixation * According to AO fracture classification, subjects with the fracture type (31-B) * Subjects (with the help of relatives) can understand the informed documents and patient questionnaires. * Subjects (with the help of relatives) voluntarily provide written informed consent to participate in the clinical study and authorize the transfer of their information to the sponsor. * The investigator believes that the subject can understand the clinical study, is willing and able to complete all research procedures and follow-up visits and can cooperate with the research procedures. * In-label use of the MCS. Exclusion Criteria: * Subject does not provide voluntary consent to participate in the study. * The researcher believes that the subjects have conditions that affect the participation and follow-up of this study. (for example, the patient lives in a remote area or has difficulty in going back to the hospital for follow-up or does not cooperate with the medical guidance and suggestions of the surgeon.) * The subjects were pregnant or lactating women. * The researchers believe that the subjects have psychological disorders, which may affect the treatment outcome. * Garden classification III and IV of femoral neck fracture patients older than 65 years * Concurrent hip osteoarthritis. * Fractures where the operative treatment will occur more than three weeks after the primary injury * Patients combined with femoral head fractures(31-C), femoral shaft fractures(32-A/B/C) or femoral trochanteric area fracture (31-A1/A2/A3). * Pathological fracture (e.g., primary or metastatic tumor) * Serious soft tissue injury, judged by the investigator, will impact the union of the fracture, combined vascular injury, and combined osteofascial compartment syndrome * Multiple systemic injuries judged by researchers not suitable for enrollment. * Revision surgeries (for example, due to malunion, nonunion or infection) * Concurrent medical conditions judged by researchers not suitable for enrollment, such as: metabolic bone disease, post-polio syndrome, poor bone quality, prior history of poor fracture healing, etc * Patients with anaesthetic and surgical contraindications * Patients known to be allergic to implant components * Patients who are currently using chemotherapeutics or accepting radiotherapy, use systematically corticosteroid hormone or growth factor, or long-term use sedative hypnotics (continuous use over 3 months) or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (continuous use over 3 months) * Intemperance judged by researchers not suitable for enrollment (e.g., excessive daily drinking or smoking, drug abuse); * Subjects participated in other clinical studies in the past 3 months, which may affect the outcome and follow-up according to the judgment of researchers. * Subjects have significant neurological or musculoskeletal disorders or may have adverse effects on gait or weight-bearing (e.g., muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, Charcot arthropathy, avascular necrosis of the femoral head).
Where it's running
-
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: XiangYu Xu, M.D.
- Email: 307542744@qq.com
- Phone: +86-15210849431
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing implants to keep femoral neck fractures steady in adults under 65
We will test whether a new angle-stable implant (Dynaloc) keeps femoral neck fractures steadier than cancellous screws or a sliding hip screw in adults aged 18–64.
-
Comparing internal fixation and hip arthroplasty for hip fractures in elderly patients
This study is testing whether surgery to fix a hip fracture or replacing the hip altogether helps older patients feel less pain and move better after their injury.
-
Collarless Actis hip stem for cementless hip replacement in Asian patients
This study tests how well a collarless Actis hip stem works in adults undergoing primary hip replacement, focusing on outcomes over five years in an East Asian population.
-
Bone marrow injection at the femoral neck fracture site in young adults with intracapsular hip fractures
This study tests whether injecting the patient’s own bone marrow into a femoral neck fracture helps it heal faster and reduces avascular necrosis in adults aged 18–55 with certain fracture types.
-
Tipmed™ Primary Hip Prosthesis: 24-Month Post-Market Follow-Up in Adults
This PMCF study tests the safety and 24‑month performance of the Tipmed hip prosthesis in adults undergoing primary hip replacement.
-
Sacral ESPB versus PENG nerve block for pain after hip hemiarthroplasty
We will see if a sacral erector spinae plane (S-ESPB) block or a pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block gives better pain relief for adults 50–90 having hip hemiarthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.