Comparing the use of orthosis versus no orthosis after surgery for spine fractures
Official title: Orthosis Versus no Orthosis After Dorsally Fixated Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures
Run by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc · NCT03097081 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether wearing a brace after spine surgery helps people with fractures feel less pain compared to those who don’t wear one.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 45 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Amsterdam, North Holland) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 2016 |
| Main results expected | January 2025 |
| Study ends | November 2026 |
| Registry record updated | January 25, 2023 |
| Trial ID | NCT03097081 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are Dutch-speaking individuals aged 18 to 65 with traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures treated by posterior fixation.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with complete or partial spinal cord injuries, those unable to wear an orthosis, or individuals with certain comorbidities may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of using an orthosis after surgical treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures. It is a randomized controlled intervention study that will compare pain relief outcomes between patients who wear an orthosis and those who do not, following posterior fixation surgery. The primary outcome will assess pain levels at six weeks post-operation, while secondary outcomes will include pain at various intervals, medication usage, quality of life, and potential complications. The study will involve Dutch-speaking patients aged 18 to 65 who have sustained specific types of thoracolumbar fractures.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide evidence on whether wearing an orthosis post-surgery improves pain management and recovery for patients with spine fractures.
How similar studies have gone: There is currently no evidence in the literature regarding the effectiveness of orthosis use after surgical treatment for these specific fractures, making this approach novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age 18 - 65 years
* Traumatic thoracolumbar spine fracture from thoracic 7 - lumbar 4
* AO fracture types A-C
* Undergoing surgical dorsal fixation for fracture
Exclusion Criteria:
* Inadequate knowledge of Dutch language or to fill in questionnaire
* Complete or partial spinal cord injury (ASIA A to D)
* (Additional) anterior surgical stabilization
* Thoracolumbar fracture of other aetiology than traumatic, e.g. pathologic, infectious
* Not able to walk before fracturing vertebra
* Unable to come to the outpatient clinic (e.g. residing outside the Netherlands)
* Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16
* Brain injury with Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) ≥ 4
* Solitary Lumbar 5 fracture
* Inability to wear an orthosis, most probable reasons:
* BMI \> 35
* Thoraco-abdominal wounds (through trauma or secondary from surgery) on places at which the orthosis contacts the body so aggravation of pain or chances of infection increase significantly.
12 of 27
* Pre-existing spine deformities (scoliosis or very severe kyphosis/lordosis) which impair the use of the orthosis or aggravate pain.
Where it's running
-
VU University medical center
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: AJ Smits, MD
- Email: aj.smits@amsterdamumc.nl
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing open and minimally invasive posterior stabilization for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures using 3D gait and muscle recordings
This trial will test whether open or minimally invasive posterior stabilization leads to faster or different walking and back-muscle recovery after thoracic or lumbar spine fractures.
-
Epione-assisted introducer placement for percutaneous pelvic and spine procedures
This will test whether the Epione device can help doctors place introducers during CT- or CBCT-guided percutaneous pelvic or spine procedures in adults.
-
Orthosis and Exercise for Grade 1–2 Spondylolisthesis
This study tests whether stabilization exercise, conventional exercise, or wearing an orthosis can improve pain, physical function, and quality of life in adults with mild spondylolisthesis.
-
Monitoring the safety and performance of Ennovate® Cervical implants
This study is looking at how safe and effective the Ennovate® Cervical implants are for patients with different spinal problems like fractures and disc disease.
-
Registry for the IlluminOss Bone Stabilization Device
This study is collecting information on how well the IlluminOss Bone Stabilization Device works and keeps patients safe after surgery for broken bones.
-
Advanced vs Conventional Ankle Foot Orthoses for Lower Limb Injury
This study tests whether advanced energy-storing AFOs improve comfort and function for adults with lower limb injuries who use AFOs.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.