Comparing surgery followed by radiation to radiation alone for spinal tumors
Official title: Separation Surgery Followed by Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy Alone for Spinal Metastases Invading the Spinal Canal: a Randomised, Non-inferiority Trial
Run by Cancer Research Antwerp · NCT06613295 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether surgery followed by radiation or radiation alone is better for helping people with spinal tumors keep their ability to walk three months after treatment.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 128 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Cancer Research Antwerp Academic / other |
| Locations | 9 sites (Aalst and 8 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 7, 2022 |
| Main results expected | March 1, 2025 |
| Study ends | March 1, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | September 25, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT06613295 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are ambulatory adults aged 18 and older with a diagnosis of solid malignant tumors and MESCC.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with non-solid primary tumors or those requiring prior surgery or radiation at the affected vertebrae may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial investigates the effectiveness of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) alone versus SABR following separation surgery in patients with malignant epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). The study aims to determine which approach better preserves ambulatory function three months after treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one receiving separation surgery followed by SABR and the other receiving SABR alone. Secondary outcomes include local control, progression-free survival, quality of life, and pain management.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a less invasive treatment option for patients with spinal tumors while maintaining mobility.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have explored similar approaches, but this specific comparison of SABR with and without surgery is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of a solid malignant tumour (preferentially histologically proven;alternatively obtained by spinal surgical procedure) * Age 18 years or older * Histological, radiological or scintigraphical evidence of spinal metastasis (no limitation in the number of sites of metastases) * Spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) \<13 (i.e. no need for stabilisation of the spine) (see Appendix 6) * Spinal metastasis with MESCC: ESCC grade 1c, 2 and 3 (see Appendix 7) * Ambulatory: being able to walk 10m without aid or with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help). * Life expectancy estimated to be at least 3 months. * World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status of 0-2 (some help) (see Appendix 3) * Patient has given written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Contra indication for MRI scan (e.g. pacemaker) * Previous RT or surgery at the level of the affected vertebrae * Non-solid primary tumours (e.g. lymphoma, multiple myeloma, germ cell tumours) * Non ambulatory at presentation * More than 3 affected vertebrae in one target site * More than 2 treatment sites * SINS ≥ 13 (unstable spine)
Where it's running
-
Zol
Genk, Belgium Recruiting -
Vitaz
Sint-Niklaas, Belgium Recruiting -
Gza
Wilrijk, Belgium Recruiting -
OLVZ Aalst
Aalst, Belgium Not yet recruiting -
AZ Klina
Brasschaat, Belgium Not yet recruiting -
Uza
Edegem, Belgium Not yet recruiting
Show 3 more locations
-
Jessa
Hasselt, Belgium Not yet recruiting -
AZ Groeninge
Kortrijk, Belgium Not yet recruiting -
AZ Sint-Maarten
Mechelen, Belgium Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Charlotte Billiet, MD, PhD — ZAS Augustinus
- Study coordinator: Charlotte Billiet, MD, PhD
- Email: gza.cancertrials@zas.be
- Phone: 03234433759
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
SumMET: Targeted radioligand therapy for c-MET–positive solid tumors
This first‑in‑human study tests the safety and potential effectiveness of a radioligand therapy called [225Ac]Ac-FL-261 in adults with advanced or metastatic solid tumors that overexpress c-MET.
-
SHR-4595 Injection in Advanced Solid Tumors: Safety, Tolerability, and Dosing in Phase 1
This early-phase trial tests SHR-4595 injections to see if they are safe and tolerable for adults with advanced solid tumors who have exhausted standard treatments.
-
FAPI PET imaging with FAPI-RuiJ and FAPI-04 in solid tumors
This study tests two FAP-targeted PET tracers (FAPI-RuiJ and FAPI-04) to see which better detects, stages, and monitors solid tumors.
-
Trop-2 Targeted PET/CT for Recurrent and Metastatic Thyroid Cancer
This study tests whether a Trop-2 targeted PET/CT scan can better detect recurrent or metastatic thyroid cancer in adults than another PET/CT scan (FAPI).
-
SI-B036 in locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer and other solid tumors
Scientists are testing SI-B036 to see if it is safe and tolerable in adults with advanced breast cancer or other solid tumors and to get early signals of whether it might help.
-
Methylscape test in body fluids for multi-cancer detection in Colombia
A simple blood, urine, or saliva test called Methylscape is being tested to see if it can detect multiple cancers and identify where the signal is coming from, using people with cancer and healthy volunteers in Colombia.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.