Clinical trial No longer in our active list Observational Ages 12 and up

Comparing root angulation assessment methods in orthodontics

Official title: Assessment of Mesiodistal Root Angulation Without Radiographic Guidance Versus CBCT Guidance: A Cross Sectional Study.

Run by Cairo University · NCT06019351 · Data updated 2026-05-14

This study is no longer in our active list. It may have stopped recruiting or finished. The details below are as of 2026-05-14 and are kept for reference. Check ClinicalTrials.gov for its current status, or see similar studies below.

This study is testing if a new imaging method called Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) can give better information about tooth root angles compared to traditional X-rays for people getting orthodontic treatment.

Quick facts

Study typeObservational
Ages12 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment141 (estimated)
SponsorCairo University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Cairo, El Manial)
Trial IDNCT06019351 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates include patients with digital models and panoramic radiographs who require CBCT for specific orthodontic interventions.

Probably not a fit

Patients with severe crowding, bizarre tooth anatomy, or those in the mixed dentition stage may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This observational study evaluates the accuracy of mesiodistal root angulation assessment using traditional panoramic radiographs versus advanced Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) guidance. It aims to determine whether CBCT provides a more precise localization of root angulation, which is crucial for effective orthodontic treatment planning. The study will involve patients who have undergone routine diagnostic procedures, including digital models and panoramic radiographs, and will assess the clinical significance of the findings. The use of OrthoAnalyzer™ software will facilitate the analysis of the collected data.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could enhance the accuracy of orthodontic treatment planning, leading to better patient outcomes.

How similar studies have gone: While the use of CBCT in orthodontics has shown promise, this specific comparison with panoramic radiographs is relatively novel.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients with digital models and panoramic radiograph as a routine diagnostic orthodontic record before treatment.
* Justified CBCT record taken for impacted and ectopic teeth, planning for MARPE (mini-screw assisted rapid palatal expansion)/MSE (maxillary skeletal expansion), critical tooth movements in periodontally compromised patients, surgery first cases, taken for previous studies and other reasons.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Severe crowding.
* Teeth with bizarre anatomy or severely decayed.
* Patients in mixed dentition stage.

Where it's running

  • Cairo University
    Cairo, El Manial, Egypt
    Recruiting

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Browse more
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.