Comparing PRP, PRF, and standard treatment for chronic skin ulcers
Official title: Efficacy of Platelet-rich Plasma Versus Platelet-rich Fibrin Versus Conventional Treatment in Chronic Non-healing Skin Ulcers: a Comparative Study
Run by Kafrelsheikh University · NCT06281483 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing if two new treatments for chronic skin ulcers, PRP and PRF, work better than standard care for helping wounds heal.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 36 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Kafrelsheikh University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Cairo) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 1, 2024 |
| Main results expected | January 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | January 2026 |
| Registry record updated | March 5, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06281483 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are patients with chronic cutaneous ulcers that have persisted for over six weeks and are between 0.5 and 10 cm in size.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with bleeding disorders, uncontrolled diabetes, active infections, or those who are pregnant or lactating may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of two newer treatments, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), in comparison to conventional methods for managing chronic non-healing skin ulcers. Chronic ulcers are defined as wounds that do not heal within six weeks despite appropriate treatment, affecting millions of individuals, particularly the elderly and diabetic populations. The study will involve patients with ulcers of varying sizes and durations, assessing the healing outcomes of the different treatment modalities. The interventions will include surgical debridement, normal saline washing, and dressing coverage alongside the experimental treatments.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide more effective treatment options for patients suffering from chronic non-healing skin ulcers.
How similar studies have gone: While the use of PRP and PRF in wound healing has shown promise in preliminary studies, this specific comparison against conventional treatments is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients presenting with cutaneous ulcers greater than six weeks of duration and a size ranging between 0.5 and 10 cm, having a normal platelet count and hemoglobin \>10 gm%. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with known bleeding disorders, and/or on oral anticoagulant therapy, uncontrolled diabetes, proven malignancy. * Patients who are pregnant or lactating. * Patients with actively infected ulcers, clinically defined by purulent discharge, green discoloration or fever, or positive culture, ulcers with exposed bone with no underlying granulation tissue, HIV, HCV, HBV patients. * Patients who are with unrealistic expectations and unwilling to give consent for treatment or photography.
Where it's running
-
Badr Hospital - Helwan University and Kafrelseikh University Hospital
Cairo, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Mohamed Aboshabana Hussein, Assistant Lecturer
- Email: dr.mohamedaboshabana@gmail.com
- Phone: 01007981008
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Alveolar Bone Regeneration with Advanced Platelet-Rrich Fibrin and Strontium-Doped Hydroxyapatite
This study tests whether using advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) alone or with strontium-doped hydroxyapatite (Sr-HA) helps regenerate bone after tooth extraction better than letting the socket heal on its own.
-
Which material for All-on-Four implants? Zantex vs Zirconia in full-arch dentures
This study tests whether Zantex or Zirconia frameworks lead to better gum health and less bacterial buildup around All-on-Four dental implants in people with no teeth.
-
Biofeedback-Assisted Pelvic Floor Training After Hysterectomy
This study tests whether biofeedback-guided pelvic floor exercises after hysterectomy can improve pelvic floor strength, reduce urinary leakage, lessen genital prolapse, and boost quality of life.
-
High-Intensity interval training vs home-based rehab after coronary bypass grafting
This trial tests whether high-intensity interval training or a home-based cardiac rehab program can better improve peak exercise capacity in people who had CABG surgery.
-
Thymoquinone 0.2% Gel to Protect Bone After Tooth Extraction
A gel with 0.2% thymoquinone is tested to see if it helps keep bone density and width after pulling a back upper tooth in adults.
-
Isometric Strengthening vs. Tens in Diabetic Shoulder Pain
This study tests whether isometric strengthening exercises or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation help reduce shoulder pain in people with diabetes.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.