Comparing pacemaker implantation and cardioneuroablation for treating atrioventricular block
Official title: TELE-monitoring for Standard Pacemaker Implantation or Delayed Pacemaker Implantation After Autonomic/Electrophysiologic Evaluation and Cardioneuroablation for managEment of Functional atrioventriculaR Block - Randomized Controlled Study
Run by American Heart of Poland · NCT05774262 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether a new treatment called cardioneuroablation is as safe and effective as traditional pacemaker implantation for people aged 18-75 with atrioventricular block.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 300 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | American Heart of Poland Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Dąbrowa Górnicza and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 1, 2023 |
| Main results expected | August 31, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | March 18, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT05774262 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18-75 with indications for elective pacemaker implantation due to functional atrioventricular block and positive atropine tests.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with atrioventricular block not meeting the inclusion criteria or those with contraindications for either treatment method may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The TELE-SPACER trial is a multicenter, randomized clinical trial designed to compare two treatment methods for functional atrioventricular block (AVB): traditional pacemaker implantation and a novel approach involving cardioneuroablation. Participants aged 18-75 with indications for pacemaker therapy will be randomized into two groups, one receiving pacemaker therapy and the other undergoing cardiovascular autonomic testing followed by cardioneuroablation. The study aims to assess the feasibility, safety, and non-inferiority of the cardioneuroablation procedure compared to standard pacemaker therapy, potentially avoiding the complications and costs associated with long-term pacing. The trial will also include a registry for participants opting out of randomization, allowing for tailored interventions.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a less invasive treatment option for patients with functional atrioventricular block, reducing reliance on permanent pacemakers.
How similar studies have gone: While the approach of cardioneuroablation is novel, similar studies have shown promise in treating autonomic dysfunction, suggesting potential for success.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Written informed consent to participate in the study 2. Age 18-75 3. Indication (at least one) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) for elective pacemaker implantation due to isolated (without sinus node dysfunction and bundle branch block) paroxysmal, persistent or reflex atrioventricular block: 1. Symptomatic first degree AVB (above 300 msec). Class IIaC 2. Symptomatic Mobitz type I second degree AVB. Class IIaC 3. AVB 2:1, even asymptomatic, but not during sleep. Class IIaC 4. Mobitz II type advanced 2nd degree AVB or complete block (3rd degree AVB). Class IC 5. Advanced AVB during AF regardless of symptoms, but not during sleep. Class IC 6. Reflex syncope in patients over 40 years of age with documented pauses within the AVB mechanism, symptomatic (\>3 sec) or asymptomatic \>6 sec. Class IC 7. Reflex syncope in patients over 40 years of age with documented pauses within AVB mechanism in the course of sick sinus syndrome (CSS). Class IC 8. Reflex syncope in patients over 40 years of age with documented pauses within AVB mechanism during tilt test. Class IC Exclusion Criteria: 1. Implanted pacemaker/ICD/CRT 2. Sinus node dysfunction with indication for pacemaker implantation 3. Planned ablation of the atrioventricular junction 4. Severe prolonged bradycardia in advanced AVB requiring intravenous drugs and temporary pacing 5. Status post cardiac surgery 6. Acute myocardial infarction and heart failure (not related to bradycardia) 7. Status post percutaneous valvular intervention or ablation 8. Acute infection or any other accompanying disease which is contraindication to percutaneous procedures and/or implantation of a pacemaker 9. Pregnancy, nursing or planned pregnancy within 12 months 10. Decompensated chronic diseases (endocrine disorders, electrolyte disorders, etc.) 11. Advanced cardiomyopathies with indication for ICD implantation in primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) 12. Advanced ventricular arrhythmias with indication for ICD implantation in primary or secondary prevention of SCD 13. Persistent right or left bundle branch block 14. Musculoskeletal diseases with separate indications for pacemaker implantation 15. Contraindications to the procedures used in the study 16. The presence of a mental illness or limitation of cognitive functions that prevent independent participation in the study, including the use of telemedicine services 17. Any abnormality found that is considered by the Principal Investigator a contraindication to participate in the stidy due to data interpretation or safety issue
Where it's running
-
American Heart of Poland
Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland Recruiting -
American Heart of Poland
Mielec, Poland Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Sebastian M Stec, MD, PhD — American Heart of Poland
- Study coordinator: Sebastian M Stec, MD, PhD
- Email: smstec@wp.pl
- Phone: +48 600-298-022
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Transjugular implantation of a leadless pacemaker (Aveir VR) for ventricular pacing
This study tests whether placing an Aveir VR leadless pacemaker through the neck vein can safely provide ventricular pacing in adults with bradycardia.
-
Focal Cryoablation vs. Radiofrequency Cardioneuroablation for Bradyarrhythmias
This study tests whether focal cryoablation can treat vagally driven slow heart rhythms as well as traditional radiofrequency ablation in adults with bradycardia or related syncope.
-
Left bundle area pacing with Closed Loop Stimulation in dual‑chamber pacemakers
This study tests whether a dual‑chamber pacemaker using left bundle area pacing and Closed Loop Stimulation can reduce device‑detected atrial fibrillation over 24 months in patients with sinus node disease and AV conduction issues.
-
Remote ECG monitoring after TAVI
This compares continuous 30-day remote ECG monitoring to standard short-term monitoring for adults after TAVI to see if it detects rhythm problems earlier.
-
Conduction system pacing vs. traditional pacing in adults with atrioventricular block
This study tests whether stimulating the heart’s conduction system can reduce heart failure events for adults needing pacemakers due to AV block.
-
Comparing two pacemaker pacing methods for AV block
This trial tests whether conduction system (left bundle branch area) pacing or standard right ventricular pacing works better for people with atrioventricular block who need a permanent pacemaker.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.