Comparing outcomes of minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
Official title: Outcomes After Esophagectomy With a Focus on Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Quality of Life
Run by University of Pittsburgh · NCT00260559 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is trying to see if patients with esophageal cancer do better in terms of recovery and quality of life after having a minimally invasive surgery compared to traditional open surgery.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 3500 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Pittsburgh Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 1999 |
| Main results expected | December 2050 |
| Study ends | December 2050 |
| Registry record updated | April 14, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT00260559 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates include patients scheduled for either minimally invasive or open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer who can provide informed consent.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who are unable to comprehend or complete the quality of life instruments or those under 18 years of age may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study assesses the short and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) compared to those undergoing open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. It focuses on both standard clinical outcomes, such as morbidity and mortality, and patient-derived outcomes, particularly quality of life (QOL) as measured by the MOS SF36 questionnaire. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the SF36 in reflecting changes in clinical status and to compare these results with disease-specific scales related to dysphagia and reflux. Additionally, it examines the impact of adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy on QOL in this patient population.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide insights into the benefits of minimally invasive techniques on quality of life for patients undergoing esophagectomy.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown promising results with minimally invasive approaches in surgical outcomes, suggesting potential benefits in quality of life, making this a relevant area of investigation.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients scheduled for MIE (Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy) * Patients scheduled for open esophagectomy * Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who are unable to comprehend or complete the QOL instruments. * Patients less than 18 years of age.
Where it's running
-
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center - Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States Recruiting -
UPMC - Hillman Cancer Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: James D Luketich, MD — UPMC - Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery
- Study coordinator: Julie A Ward, BSN
- Email: wardj@upmc.edu
- Phone: 412-647-8583
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Paravertebral Catheter Analgesia Versus Epidural Analgesia for Totally Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
This trial tests whether paravertebral catheter analgesia can provide comparable pain control to epidural analgesia for patients undergoing totally minimally invasive esophagectomy.
-
Survey for patients with esophageal cancer and upper digestive diseases
This study is trying to gather information from patients with esophageal cancer and other upper digestive issues to see how they are doing after treatment and improve future care.
-
PF-08098488 in adults with advanced solid tumors
This study tests PF-08098488 in adults whose cancer has progressed or returned after prior treatment.
-
Pain management plan implementation for major open abdominal surgeries
This trial tests an opioid-epidural pain management approach to see if it improves post-surgical pain control for adults undergoing open abdominal procedures like colectomy, hepatectomy, and nephrectomy.
-
Modular Robot-Assisted Esophagectomy vs. Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
This trial tests whether modular robotic-assisted esophagectomy using the Carina platform works better than conventional 3D thoracoscopic esophagectomy for people with resectable esophageal cancer.
-
MGC030 in adults with advanced solid tumors
This trial tests MGC030 in adults with advanced urothelial, gastric/GEJ, esophageal, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, or GEJ cancers to see if it is safe and whether it can shrink tumors or stop growth.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.